0x457
I was confused because the project was already available, with detailed setup instructions, an `llms.txt`, and everything else needed to get started.
Then he showed me a screenshot of him asking ChatGPT about it. Apparently, ChatGPT was using some outdated cached information or something, because it gave him a wall of text explaining that the project was still “coming soon” and wasn't ready to use.
If he'd just opened the landing page, he would've seen that the project was already available.
I won't deny that there is a use for portable binaries that don't depend on specific version of glibc, but its such a niche.
Doesn't mean that there isn't another exploit chain that can be used though. Challenge also had 4 workers total, so pining one worker wasn't that hard.
Yeah, I called this out as the main appeal of alpine. IMO no one should be using musl, but its another story.
> or people who had a test/deploy/debug cycle on environments that necessarily had no layer cache (ephemeral VMs, one-shot kubernetes clusters, OpenWRT routers that lost the layer cache on reboot). Or people with network-constrained traffic from registries or mirrors thereof.
Debian slim is ~30 MB compressed, and distroless/static is ~2 MiB. Small images aren’t unique to Alpine. With a fast local mirror, the extra download is negligible.
> Or people in environments that took container security findings (perhaps too) seriously and were tired of triaging endless reports for random dependencies in "FROM ubuntu" containers, and wanted a default required-by-policy base image that didn't come with the world.
1) Nobody’s forcing you to use a full Ubuntu image.
2) Alpine images still get plenty of security findings, often in the same dependencies your application needs regardless of the base image.
3) Nix is the best container builder anyway.
Alpine’s connection to static linking is mainly that it provides a convenient musl build environment. A fully static binary can run in `FROM scratch`.
Changed my lab to use the same alpine + php = tada working exploit.
You can still easily buy Bluray player and open source your discs with ARM (not CPU/SoCs, different one)
Depends on who wrote the original code. With postgres its sus, but if it's another AI...I wouldn't be surprised. I also saw code writtem by humans that is a result of "I can't figure out how to make this safe and concurrent, so imma just place giant mutex here", and it like 100 lines change to fix that.
I can see that in a music video. At a live performance, I see a bunch of people in front of me and maybe some distant figures onstage. I definitely can’t see the drummer doing drummer things or anyone’s fingers on a guitar. And some performers just sound like dogshit live.
IMO, live performances are about the atmosphere, which can be hit or miss depending on the performer and the crowd. I’d probably like Rammstein live, but I’d also probably hate the crowd.
A studio recording is also a performance, just not a live one. Movies are similar: we don’t watch “the first take of the day”; we watch the result put together from the best takes.
No idea why UPS keeps redesigning other than signal "we still up to date with trends", its not like its rebranding going to make me want to ship anything that I don't already need to (and will ship with USPS unless its overnight in which case I will go with FedEx).
Interfaces get redesigned, in opinion, either because: a) just because (bad) b) certain things worked the way it worked only because it had to fit existing design and eventually old design just couldn't fit new feature(s) (can be good or bad, depending on execution)
In my opinion, it doesn’t excel at anything beyond being pleasant to read. Maybe if Go hadn’t come along, it would have gained more traction and developed a better concurrency runtime. Very few companies are publicly using it.
Plus, since 00s Ruby = Ruby on Rails, so it didn't appeal to ruby (on rails) developers back then.
I literally do not care that someone can "hit high notes" or that "unlike this other artist, my favorite artist can actually sing." I'm listening to music, not grading music class students.
Only in a sense that i went to a battle and lost all of its data to corruption. Should be removed from in-tree so people don't accidently use it.
I don't think it does more harm than good. Maybe I'm biased because it's been very good for me and the people around me.
> Isn't the criticism rather that the poll distinguishes between you and the people polled?
No. The argument being made in this thread is that people hate AI slop (people just hate slop), rather than AI in general. This poll was linked as evidence that people hate AI. My argument is that the poll is flawed and does nothing to counter the point being made in this thread about slop vs. AI.
As for Steam...ever since they opened up who can publish and how publishing works, there been _a lot_ of slop pre-AI. I'd rather have more interesting and more controvesial filters. People will get surprised how few recent games aren't going to be filtered by "No AI"
While I hate nightmarish ai slop pictures some restaurants use and some very ugly banners some street vendors use, I recognize some some AI generated assets are pretty neat.
Same as when I got annoyed that library I wanted to use turns out does not check any of the boxes it claims to check, because its pure untested slop. I would have no issues with it being AI if it worked because I used it to make my own versio of that library that in fact works as advertised.