Of course you disagree, you are not the one being targeted.

I wonder how long you would stand being impersonated in various situations. Or your parents. Or your significant other. Or your (adult) kids. Would you still tell them to their face there is "no violation"?

You're wrong, I would still disagree. In fact, you're welcome to make some fake nudes of me, my pictures aren't too hard to find.

Of you. But you dodge my question about people who aren't you but you care about (if there is any of the sort).

I answered that question in the first sentence of my previous comment...

Personality rights are a thing, publishing your likeness without your consent in particular in any commercial context is illegal in just about any jurisdiction on earth.

I meant from a moral perspective. I'm aware that it is illegal in some jurisdictions but this would almost certainly not be considered "commercial use" in the context of likeness (unless the author uses the generated picture in an ad, etc.).

If Grok is charging a fee to do this, then it's "commercial use".

I highly doubt so. Paid software like Photoshop has been used to generate fake pictures for ages and yet they are legal. It's how the generated pictures are used that matters.