News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Introducing gpt-oss by organsnyder on Tuesday August 05, 2025 @02:03PM (#44801822)
Re:Introducing gpt-oss by dang on Tuesday August 05, 2025 @05:19PM (#44804463)
Ok, I've put https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-oss/ in the top text there as well. Thanks!
Re:Introducing gpt-oss by tonyhart7 on Tuesday August 05, 2025 @02:48PM (#44802439)
only 128k context length???
Re:Introducing gpt-oss by alexshendi on Tuesday August 05, 2025 @02:32PM (#44802229)
OSS as in "Office of Strategic Services"?
Re:Introducing gpt-oss by rectang on Tuesday August 05, 2025 @02:39PM (#44802335)
Open Source Software.
Re:Introducing gpt-oss by elif on Tuesday August 05, 2025 @03:53PM (#44803407)
FOSS minus freedom
Re:Introducing gpt-oss by rafram on Tuesday August 05, 2025 @03:58PM (#44803464)
Nobody wants to use a model with a "FOSS" - as in copyleft - license, since you could conceivably need to license anything it's deeply integrated in under a compatible license. The gpt-oss README specifically mentions the lack of "copyleft restrictions or patent risk" as a selling point.
Re:Introducing gpt-oss by JoshTriplett on Tuesday August 05, 2025 @04:03PM (#44803531)
FOSS does not imply copyleft. Permissive licenses and copyleft licenses are both FOSS.
Re:Introducing gpt-oss by tptacek on Tuesday August 05, 2025 @04:26PM (#44803791)
They're Apache licensed.
Re:Introducing gpt-oss by speedgoose on Tuesday August 05, 2025 @03:42PM (#44803254)
But it’s open weights.
Re:Introducing gpt-oss by reactordev on Tuesday August 05, 2025 @03:44PM (#44803282)
obviously super software.
Re:Introducing gpt-oss by miguelpaoc on Wednesday August 06, 2025 @03:25PM (#44816506)
I wrote a detailed breakdown of the models and why this release is a big deal — especially for devs who want to run or fine-tune LLMs locally: https://medium.com/@miguel.paracuellos.inf/openai-just-went-...

Curious how others are thinking of using these — would love to hear your setups.