Re:Facts will not Save You - AI, History and Soviet Sci-Fi
by jadbox on Monday August 04, 2025 @05:20PM
(#44791493)
Could we maybe say that an LLM which can update its own model weights using its own internal self-narrating log may be 'closer' to being dynamic? We can use Wolfram's computational irreducibility principle which says that even simple rule-based functions will often cause unpredictable patterns of its return values. You could say that computer randomness is deterministic, but could we maybe say that ontologically a Quantum-NN LLMs could perhaps be classified on paper as being Dynamic? (unless you believe that quantum computing is deterministic).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Facts will not Save You - AI, History and Soviet Sci-Fi
by nullpoint420 on Tuesday August 05, 2025 @08:34AM
(#44797238)
Not saying it isn’t possible, but this is scope creep to the greatest extent. The customer wants to play baseball.
Now we’re trying to build a self-learning and improving AI to replace a human who is also capable of self-learning and improving.