Re:Qwen-Image: Crafting with Native Text Rendering
by jacooper on Monday August 04, 2025 @04:56PM
(#44791244)
Not to mention, flux models are for non-commercial use only.
Re:Qwen-Image: Crafting with Native Text Rendering
by doctorpangloss on Monday August 04, 2025 @05:09PM
(#44791375)
the license for flux models is $1,000/mo, hardly an obstacle to any serious commercial usage
Re:Qwen-Image: Crafting with Native Text Rendering
by liuliu on Monday August 04, 2025 @05:35PM
(#44791630)
Per 100k image. And it is additionally $0.01 per image. Considering H100 is $1.5 per hour and you can get 1 image per 5s, we are talking about bare-metal cost of ~$0.002 per image + $0.01 license cost.
Besides style transfer, object additions and removals, text editing, manipulation of human poses, it also supports object detection, semantic segmentation, depth/edge estimation, super-resolution and novel view synthesis (NVS) i.e. synthesizing new perspectives from a base image. It’s quite a smorgasbord!
Early results indicate to me that gpt-image-1 has a bit better sharpness and clarity but I’m honestly not sure if OpenAI doesn’t simply do some basic unsharp mask or something as a post-processing step? I’ve always felt suspicious about that, because the sharpness seems oddly uniform even in out-of-focus areas? And sometimes a bit much, even.
Otherwise, yeah this one looks about as good.
Which is impressive! I thought OpenAI had a lead here from their unique image generation solution that’d last them this year at least.
Oh, and Flux Krea has lasted four days since announcement! In case this one is truly similar in quality to gpt-image-1.