News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by Dylan16807 on Sunday August 03, 2025 @07:38PM (#44780778)
> have to get government approval before

That is not the only form of regulation, and not the form that would be applied here. This would be after the fact, going after companies that try to pull things like this.

Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by terminalshort on Sunday August 03, 2025 @10:19PM (#44781556)
But companies should be able to pull things like this. If a company isn't paying market rate I see no problem with a competitor destroying it by hiring away all its best employees.
Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by Dylan16807 on Monday August 04, 2025 @02:00AM (#44782514)
If a competitor gets too big and is using its money to remove competition before it can be challenged, that's a problem.

In normal competitive situations this rule wouldn't apply. If one company wants the assets and employees of another company they can go ahead and buy it. And any company can offer better jobs as plain old jobs. The negotiation here was not just some high end job openings.

Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by scarface_74 on Monday August 04, 2025 @02:54AM (#44782785)
There was no world where Windsurf was going to challenge Google and the same is true for the examples.

These were regular old job offers. At any time, any of the employees could have stayed at Windsurf instead of taking a lot more money from Google.

Google didn’t want the “assets”. Google wanted the people. Even then they only wanted the best people.

Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by Dylan16807 on Monday August 04, 2025 @03:08AM (#44782842)
> These were regular old job offers.

They were not.

> Google didn’t want the “assets”.

They paid 2.4 billion in licensing fees. Or something like that, looks like part of that was special structured not a regular old job offer money.