Every story and comment from the Hacker News API, in a layout borrowed from 2001.
A comment on Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny. Parent comment
They were not.
> Google didn’t want the “assets”.
They paid 2.4 billion in licensing fees. Or something like that, looks like part of that was special structured not a regular old job offer money.
There are no comments on this comment yet.
They were not.
> Google didn’t want the “assets”.
They paid 2.4 billion in licensing fees. Or something like that, looks like part of that was special structured not a regular old job offer money.