News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by MattDamonSpace on Sunday August 03, 2025 @11:59AM (#44777451)
It wasn’t the outcome, it was the bad reasoning and the overall desire for interference

Does it really matter if Figma was bought vs IPO? No of course not. Khan just needs a poster child for her overall intervention philosophy.

Pointing at Figma as a success for her overall world view is like the religious who say “oh god saved me from that flood” while ignoring the hundreds who did die. The Almighty wanted them to die? Or…?

If you’re gonna claim the successes you have to claim the failures

Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by nicoburns on Sunday August 03, 2025 @12:18PM (#44777589)
> Does it really matter if Figma was bought vs IPO? No of course not.

I think it matters. Look what happened when Adobe acquired Macromedia in 2005. The innovative product (Fireworks) that brought many (but not all) many of the innovations that would later come in Sketch and then Figma was left to slowly die because it competed with their flagship product (Photoshop). That delayed innovation in that market segment by around a decade.

Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by pests on Sunday August 03, 2025 @01:06PM (#44778012)
Fireworks was great when I was a young teen and first learning the difference vector graphics could make.

Let’s not forget our beloved Flash, who knows how Macromedia would have handled it and maybe it wouldn’t have had to be removed from browsers under Adobe’s watch due to security issues.

I almost never see anyone mention Macromedia in relation to Flash these days, almost as if history has rewritten it to an Adobe thing.

Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by mschuster91 on Sunday August 03, 2025 @01:37PM (#44778215)
> who knows how Macromedia would have handled it and maybe it wouldn’t have had to be removed from browsers under Adobe’s watch due to security issues.

Flash always was a dumpsterfire, and so were virtually all browser plugins using native code. There's a reason NPAPI was deprecated eventually.

The exception of course is ActiveX. There was no way to ever make that shitshow even reasonably safe, simply given how its execution model was.

Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by benreesman on Sunday August 03, 2025 @02:01PM (#44778378)
It was kind of fun watching adult men say the word "ActiveX" out loud and in earnest though. DCOM with Apartment Threading just didn't have that same "Power Rangers Bad Guy" energy.
Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by mschuster91 on Monday August 04, 2025 @03:23AM (#44782915)
From a security perspective, ActiveX is a relic from days long past, when people could be reasonably trusted - an assumption that broke around the early '00s when "dialer" malware offered a first way to extract funds from victims.

From a developer perspective, I'm still sad that it went away. The old COM/OLE/ActiveX ecosystem was flexible to a degree nothing has never ever been since.

Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by benreesman on Sunday August 03, 2025 @12:03PM (#44777481)
What failures? Tech has been Godzilla stomping every conceivable obstacle to total world domination. Its like half the fucking stock market.

Someone caught a shooting star in the palm of their hand one time and this happened.

What are you talking about?

Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by Jolter on Sunday August 03, 2025 @12:30PM (#44777676)
What failures, exactly?
Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by fmbb on Sunday August 03, 2025 @12:34PM (#44777727)
If there are no failures how can you claim them?
Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by tsimionescu on Sunday August 03, 2025 @03:03PM (#44778830)
It doesn't matter per se if Figma is bought instead of an IPO. It does matter that Adobe was about to pay about one third the fair market price of Figma, and she successfully stopped this market manipulation.