Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny
by mschuster91 on Sunday August 03, 2025 @01:37PM
(#44778215)
> who knows how Macromedia would have handled it and maybe it wouldn’t have had to be removed from browsers under Adobe’s watch due to security issues.
Flash always was a dumpsterfire, and so were virtually all browser plugins using native code. There's a reason NPAPI was deprecated eventually.
The exception of course is ActiveX. There was no way to ever make that shitshow even reasonably safe, simply given how its execution model was.
Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny
by benreesman on Sunday August 03, 2025 @02:01PM
(#44778378)
It was kind of fun watching adult men say the word "ActiveX" out loud and in earnest though. DCOM with Apartment Threading just didn't have that same "Power Rangers Bad Guy" energy.
Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny
by mschuster91 on Monday August 04, 2025 @03:23AM
(#44782915)
From a security perspective, ActiveX is a relic from days long past, when people could be reasonably trusted - an assumption that broke around the early '00s when "dialer" malware offered a first way to extract funds from victims.
From a developer perspective, I'm still sad that it went away. The old COM/OLE/ActiveX ecosystem was flexible to a degree nothing has never ever been since.
Let’s not forget our beloved Flash, who knows how Macromedia would have handled it and maybe it wouldn’t have had to be removed from browsers under Adobe’s watch due to security issues.
I almost never see anyone mention Macromedia in relation to Flash these days, almost as if history has rewritten it to an Adobe thing.