News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by skrebbel on Sunday August 03, 2025 @07:50AM (#44775916)
You do not "receive" VC, you sell shares (and control). You write as if it's some sort of grant that Figma uniquely got access to.
Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by MrGilbert on Sunday August 03, 2025 @08:15AM (#44776015)
I don't see an issue with my wording here. You receive money, or "venture capital", which you should spend on talent acquisiting, marketing, you-name-it. If I were to assume that VC comes without strings attached, I'd have used the appropriate wording.
Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by MrGilbert on Sunday August 03, 2025 @09:09AM (#44776334)
I think the more common term is to "raise money". But at the end, you receive money that you should spend. With strings attached, of course. That’s the nature of VC.
Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by skrebbel on Sunday August 03, 2025 @03:09PM (#44778885)
Yes but that's pretty common and in no way an unfair advantage.