Every generation, we seem to add a level of abstraction conceding because for most of us, it enhances productivity. And every generation, there is a crowd who rails against the new abstraction, mostly unaware of all of the levels of abstraction they already use in their coding.
BUT neither are humans, if you give two different humans the same task, then, unless they copy one another, then you will get two different results.
Further, as those humans evolve through their career, the code that they produce will also change.
Now, I do want to point out that I'm very much still at the "LLMs are an aid, not the full answer.. yet" point, but a lot of the argument against them seems to be (rapidly) coming to the point where it's no longer valid (AI slop and all).
Thats true, but giving a human a task isn't coding - its project management
Secondly, and this is far more important, it's telling a machine what you want it to do - in text
Exactly like coding.
I mean full credit to you with your disingenuous goalpost shifting and appeals to authority, but reality has no time for you (and neither do I anymore).
Notice how nobody is skeptical of compilers?