News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by DenverR on Saturday August 02, 2025 @08:18PM (#44772947)
Love the FTC getting to decide if you’re permitted to sell your startup or forced to deliver more shareholder value.
Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by breadwinner on Saturday August 02, 2025 @08:21PM (#44772961)
If a big company in dominant position is allowed to gobble up any and all upstart competitors that's bad for competition, and it is the FTC's job to preserve competition.
Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by DenverR on Saturday August 02, 2025 @10:37PM (#44773623)
How was Figma able to generate any value operating in Adobe’s powerful monopoly?
Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by schmorptron on Sunday August 03, 2025 @07:10AM (#44775741)
significantly better product with no mature comparable adobe counterpart
Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by linotype on Saturday August 02, 2025 @08:20PM (#44772954)
As an investor that can’t invest in private companies, I love it unsarcastically.
Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by BobAliceInATree on Saturday August 02, 2025 @08:34PM (#44773033)
$20 billion sell price is no longer a “startup”
Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by mosura on Saturday August 02, 2025 @09:48PM (#44773432)
Indeed, in a week Meta will offer that to an ML undergrad as a signing bonus.
Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by kelnos on Saturday August 02, 2025 @10:34PM (#44773610)
I do love it. Companies don't exist solely to enrich their founders, they exist to provide a benefit to society. There needs to be a balance, of course, but if allowing a sale does not benefit society, then we should not allow it.

> your startup

You're under the misconception that companies "belong" to individuals. Companies are legal frameworks that society has decided upon. We could legally decide that M&A just isn't allowed, ever, if we wanted to. (I don't think that would be a good idea, but I hope you see my point.)

Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by DenverR on Saturday August 02, 2025 @10:55PM (#44773706)
Congratulations you’ve just described central planning.

So “society” should be able to veto a sale, but when payroll is due the owners are on the hook?

Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by samrus on Sunday August 03, 2025 @01:02AM (#44774187)
Reductionist. Your phrasing it like the onky options are full central planning and libertarianism. Theyre both wrong. You need the free market to do what it is capable of, and regulate it when its isnt. The free market was going to let monopolies form. We have all already agreed thats bad. Khan's policies just updated that to the tech sphere
Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by mistercheph on Sunday August 03, 2025 @08:20AM (#44776047)
Actually, the owners not being on the hook when payroll comes due and the business is out of cash is exactly the protection that society has extended to incorporated businesses. But I'd be happy to horse trade unregulated m&a activity for owners, boardmembers and executives having full liability exposure, financial and criminal.
Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by bagacrap on Sunday August 03, 2025 @08:45AM (#44776180)
It's also not "your" startup once there are shareholders, including employees.

If it's a one person shop, then sure it's "yours", and the FTC can't block you from being hired (that I'm aware).

Re:Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny by kccqzy on Sunday August 03, 2025 @11:14AM (#44777133)
It sounds like you are actually upset at Congress, which created FTC and gave it the power to decide if you can sell your startup.