Re:You know what: Microsoft became miserably incompetent in IT
by charcircuit on Thursday July 31, 2025 @02:48AM
(#44743053)
It was an unnecessary comment to include in the article in my opinion. It doesn't affect the overall story, is potentially libelous, and trivializes the complexity of fighting abuse at scale.
I agree it's irrelevant. It makes 0 sense to me to include unless it's backed in truth.
Re:You know what: Microsoft became miserably incompetent in IT
by mikekaganski on Thursday July 31, 2025 @02:56AM
(#44743102)
Irrelevant is "lack of references when one describes some reactions", not "this is what I thought, when I faced that; and I described my thoughts and feelings in a post of mine in my own blog dedicated to my thoughts and feelings".
Re:You know what: Microsoft became miserably incompetent in IT
by charcircuit on Thursday July 31, 2025 @03:02AM
(#44743137)
Fair. I could have raised skepticism of the claim without including the reference to references. But I wanted to make my comment longer, and the bit about references was mentioned the sentence before the sentence before the claim.
I also now realize that you are likely the author of the article that was posted, so I will wish you luck in resolving your account issues.
If you say that it's not a depiction of what someone thinks and does facing something, you just need to improve reading skills.
And basically that wasn't something important in the article; I made it rather clear. Their following catch22 was the most likable thing IMO; that was what I explicitly emphasized.
I wonder why do I write all that, though. If someone just wants to find something irrelevant, and build their criticism on that, there's no way to prevent it.