Re:AntiSec leaks 1,000,001 Apple UDIDs, Device Names/Types
by mintplant on Tuesday September 04, 2012 @12:03AM
(#4473040)
> It proves that the author of the rant is the leaker of the data, not just some guy linking to data someone else posted.
I don't see what would stop you from stating the password to a file you didn't upload.
Re:AntiSec leaks 1,000,001 Apple UDIDs, Device Names/Types
by nikatwork on Tuesday September 04, 2012 @12:28AM
(#4473110)
because you wouldn't know the password before the public announcement, and after the announcement it doesn't matter.
Re:AntiSec leaks 1,000,001 Apple UDIDs, Device Names/Types
by akennberg on Tuesday September 04, 2012 @12:10AM
(#4473056)
That's why for these types of archives the password actually contains the credentials.
Re:AntiSec leaks 1,000,001 Apple UDIDs, Device Names/Types
by arn on Tuesday September 04, 2012 @12:11AM
(#4473061)
true, but in this case the password contains "antis3c" [Antisec], the group that is responsible.
Re:AntiSec leaks 1,000,001 Apple UDIDs, Device Names/Types
by Groxx on Tuesday September 04, 2012 @12:16AM
(#4473083)
So download it, decrypt it, and pick a different password. Takes a couple minutes, tops. And if your 'release' gets more attention than the original, how does the original prove that's what happened, or even get heard?
Re:AntiSec leaks 1,000,001 Apple UDIDs, Device Names/Types
by Devilboy on Tuesday September 04, 2012 @02:02AM
(#4473347)
You can see who came first, the internet knows.
It also causes all the data to be released atomically even if it took a while to upload to all the places.