Warp.dev Terminal – Overpriced, Buggy, and AI-Sabotaged My Code

Re:Warp.dev Terminal – Overpriced, Buggy, and AI-Sabotaged M... by aitchnyu on Monday July 28, 2025 @02:43AM (#44707904)

Everything reinforces my choice of Aider+Openrouter+code. I use models 20x cheaper than Sonnet, completely pay as you go, nobody is playing games with models, their LLM bills and my context to turn a profit. I generate Python scripts with Mongo and Cloudwatch queries instead of getting angry at the mystical sparkly button UX on their apps.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Warp.dev Terminal – Overpriced, Buggy, and AI-Sabotaged M... by atmosx on Monday July 28, 2025 @04:03AM (#44708436)

I would really like to learn more about your setup. Can you share details?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Warp.dev Terminal – Overpriced, Buggy, and AI-Sabotaged M... by aitchnyu on Monday July 28, 2025 @08:45AM (#44710306)

I paid for 5$ of credits from OpenRouter and looked up their hosted models. I installed Aider and run it in watch mode in my project. I then create comments with instructions at various files (like #refer this ai) and add ! to last command to execute it. I have disabled autocommit but I commit frequently manually to recover when it acts dumb and overwrites stuff.

https://aider.chat/docs/usage/watch.html I'm trying https://openrouter.ai/qwen/qwen3-235b-a22b-2507

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Warp.dev Terminal – Overpriced, Buggy, and AI-Sabotaged M... by Retsoat on Friday August 08, 2025 @09:06AM (#44836524)

warp is definitely pricey, but it's the best way to get SOTA models like o3 and opus 4.1 to work properly in your terminal, in my opinion.

you're paying for Warp's integration, which for most people is better than what DIY can accomplish.

[ Parent | on HN ]