Ok, so I'm just having trouble seeing how your situation is at all relevant to this discussion about the merits of jj. You simply have to use what you're assigned.

It isn't, you decided it was, reposting my comment.

> If I had an option, I would still be using something like Subversion or Mercurial.

> As it is, I go with whatever our clients require of us, and that isn't jj.

I share no desire to use jj in those words.

But how is that a relevant comment for this post about jj? People are talking about one thing and you're saying "I either can't use it at all, or am just happy with something else already". There was no discussion of the merits or shortcomings of jj...

All I was saying is that if a client requires you to use git, you could use jj without them knowing/caring - unless your entire workstation is under tight control, in which case, again, it's not relevant to the discussion