nchmy
Everyone has to watch it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZnaXDRwu84
I find the Antichrist interesting. His views on...
But if you're not inclined to educated yourself via the tremendous resource I shared, I suppose you could look at
https://wpt.fyi to see how far behind safari lags in supporting features.
There's also the fact that a proof of concept port of Microsoft edge to IOS significantly outperformed safari.
https://www.theregister.com/software/2026/06/17/apples-webki...
Chrome is also not the only chromium browser. There's also Vivaldi, brave etc, which make up for some of the ad-related shortcomings of Chrome. I happily use Vivaldi.
Though, there's also plenty of completely innocent, decent, but stupid people. Be it innately or just as a result of a terrible set of environmental factors
Of course there's stupid people. A lot of them. It's simply dishonest, manipulative or plain stupid or say otherwise.
If this article was more insightful, thoughtful, etc it would be saying that a smart, decent, wise etc person wouldn't belittle anyone for the combination of innate intelligence and environmental factors that caused them to not be thoughtful, creative, able/willing to learn etc.
And they'd moreover perhaps even take the responsibility upon themselves to try to do something about it - addressing inequality, social and educational systems, changing culture, better family planning, and endless other things.
Though, it makes me think of the quote "Science advances one funeral at a time" - Max Planck
The solution, of course, is not to simply start charging for all actions, because then everyone would wake up to all sorts of mystery charges. They'd need to notify that forked actions would be turned off and then opt-in for paid actions.
Ps to the original poster. I screw things like this up in my 2nd language all the time.
"more" and "-er" are sort of redundant. You could say
More light (but this is just awkward - you'd just say lighter).
Much lighter gives an extra degree of lightness than lighter.
Much much lighter even moreso. There's nothing wrong with saying it like this in an informal context like this, but it would generally be better to use words like significantly, vastly, enormously, slightly, a bit, considerably etc to modify the degree of "lighter"
Any LLM could explain the nuances of all of this in much much more detail (this actually makes sense, because detail is not -er).
English is difficult, but dont let that stop you - it is easy to communicate effectively with even a low degree of proficiency, when the other person is acting in good faith.
It was a stray that showed up, was covered in fleas. I decided to bathe it and it didnt occur to me that cold/room temp water would not be good for it. It was fighting but I just assumed it didnt like the water. Then it just went limp.
Quickly googled CPR cat, saw something in the (pre-AI) preview thing about blow into its nostrils (the chest was quite surprisingly inflating like a balloon without much force), and just started doing that while poking/pinching its heart area. Some amount of time later - could have been 5 seconds or 45 - it sputtered back to life.
I found it a foster shortly after. I have significant allergies to cat hair, scratches etc...
This judge should lose his job
And, of course, most of the tools have created their own GUIs anyway, which are far worse than VS Code (even when they've forked VSCode itself!)
I think the "borderline psychotic" phrasing is apt.
Perhaps the article says that, but the framing is all wrong