News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nobody Knows How to Build with AI Yet by Quitschquat on Saturday July 19, 2025 @12:42PM (#44617019)
Google doesn’t have to change search. It already returns AI generated crap before anything useful.
Re:Nobody Knows How to Build with AI Yet by arrowsmith on Saturday July 19, 2025 @12:45PM (#44617042)
To be fair, Google also returns a lot of useless crap that wasn't generated by AI.
Re:Nobody Knows How to Build with AI Yet by jenscow on Saturday July 19, 2025 @03:30PM (#44618551)
wasn't generated by their AI, more like
Re:Nobody Knows How to Build with AI Yet by patcon on Saturday July 19, 2025 @12:49PM (#44617089)
I have systemic concerns with how Google is changing roles from "knowledge bridging" to "knowledge translating", but in terms of information: I find it very useful.

You find it gives you poor information?

Re:Nobody Knows How to Build with AI Yet by aDyslecticCrow on Saturday July 19, 2025 @01:01PM (#44617210)
Always check the sources. I've personally found it;

- Using a source to claim the opposite of what the source says.

- Point to irrelevant sources.

- Use a very untrustworthy source.

- Give our sources that do not have anything to do with what it says.

- Make up additional things like any other LLM without source or internet search capability, despite reading sources.

I've specifically found Gemeni (the one Google puts at the top of searches) is hallucination-prone, and I've had far better results with other agents with search capability.

So... presenting a false or made-up answer to a person searching the web on a topic they don't understand... I'd really like to see a massive lawsuit cooked up about this when someone inevitably burns their house down or loses their life.

Re:Nobody Knows How to Build with AI Yet by siliconwrath on Saturday July 19, 2025 @04:41PM (#44619181)
I’ve had to report AI summaries to Google several times for telling me restaurant items don’t contain ingredients I'm allergic to, when the cited “source” allergen menu says otherwise. They’re gonna kill someone.
Re:Nobody Knows How to Build with AI Yet by LtWorf on Sunday July 20, 2025 @04:02AM (#44622911)
> - Using a source to claim the opposite of what the source says.

That's because a lot of people do that all the time when arguing online. Cite something without bothering to read it.

Re:Nobody Knows How to Build with AI Yet by mrandish on Saturday July 19, 2025 @01:34PM (#44617504)
Append -ai to your query to omit AI results.
Re:Nobody Knows How to Build with AI Yet by LtWorf on Sunday July 20, 2025 @04:01AM (#44622903)
I appended changing my search engine
Re:Nobody Knows How to Build with AI Yet by accrual on Saturday July 19, 2025 @01:42PM (#44617593)
I like the way DuckDuckGo does it - it offers a button to generate a response if you want to, but it doesn't shove it down your throat.

It's handy when I just need the quick syntax of a command I rarely need, etc.

Re:Nobody Knows How to Build with AI Yet by brabel on Saturday July 19, 2025 @12:54PM (#44617146)
I was a bit wary of trusting the AI summaries Google has been including in search results… but after a few checks it seems like it’s not crap at all, it’s pretty good!
Re:Nobody Knows How to Build with AI Yet by SoMomentary on Saturday July 19, 2025 @12:59PM (#44617198)
I think their point is that all of the content out there is turning in to AI Slop so it won't matter if search changes because the results themselves have already been changed.