News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sad Day For Microsoft: 5,000 Laid Off, Earnings And Reven... by jonursenbach on Thursday January 22, 2009 @12:40PM (#445094)
Perhaps they shouldn't have spent so much money on those shitty ads with Seinfeld.
Re:Sad Day For Microsoft: 5,000 Laid Off, Earnings And Reven... by thorax on Thursday January 22, 2009 @01:43PM (#445190)
It's hard to say what the quarter would have been like without a major ad push in Q3. Maybe the ads were bad, but maybe their revenue would have been worse without them-- solely from a business perspective, you have to be careful with statements like that.

For all I know, their advertisement strategy is what saved the company from needing to lay off 20k in this announcement.

Re:Sad Day For Microsoft: 5,000 Laid Off, Earnings And Reven... by thomasmallen on Thursday January 22, 2009 @02:07PM (#445212)
Unlikely. Those Seinfeld ads didn't actually try to sell anything. A bit of overpriced, mild brand reinforcement most likely would not have affected the company's short-term prospects.

By the way, what M$ is doing here is very screwed up. They're laying off the first batch (1400) immediately, but using the remaining 3600 as a threat to make competition cutthroat. I might just quit if I worked there.

Re:Sad Day For Microsoft: 5,000 Laid Off, Earnings And Reven... by Andys on Thursday January 22, 2009 @03:37PM (#445329)
Wow, that is really sad and not something I would have expected from MS.
Re:Sad Day For Microsoft: 5,000 Laid Off, Earnings And Reven... by mattmaroon on Thursday January 22, 2009 @06:42PM (#445616)
It's also probably not true. It may happen, but there's no evidence it was intended that way. Layoffs are often done slowly in tranches.
Re:Sad Day For Microsoft: 5,000 Laid Off, Earnings And Reven... by dmix on Thursday January 22, 2009 @01:27PM (#445167)
To be fair, it sounded like a good business decision but it was poorly executed.