It’s true because you used _…_ for emphasis? Bet you sat alone in a room shaking a fist in sanctimonious fashion being so bold in syntax and ignorance?
You removed my argument from its original context of finance and real resource use, which made it untrue. Leave them be and it’s still true.
And even if what you say in your last point about purchases is true that’s not a reason to stick with the pattern of also selling paperback books. Two manufacturing pipelines to accommodate both formats also uses up resources.
Go ahead and obsess over money I’ll focus on the physical resources use which actually exists whereas money is a social illusion.
So I guess I’m gonna do what you did and just ignore your argument altogether.
You removed my argument from its original context of finance and real resource use, which made it untrue. Leave them be and it’s still true.
And even if what you say in your last point about purchases is true that’s not a reason to stick with the pattern of also selling paperback books. Two manufacturing pipelines to accommodate both formats also uses up resources.
Go ahead and obsess over money I’ll focus on the physical resources use which actually exists whereas money is a social illusion.
So I guess I’m gonna do what you did and just ignore your argument altogether.