Re:US Supreme Court limits federal judges' power to block Tr...
by peddling-brink on Friday June 27, 2025 @05:51PM
(#44400569)
Not all people affected by an EO have an equal opportunity to generate that paperwork. Going to court or getting involved in the legal system have costs, of both time and money. Not something all people have enough of to spare.
Re:US Supreme Court limits federal judges' power to block Tr...
by paulryanrogers on Saturday June 28, 2025 @12:01AM
(#44402230)
We don't have enough courts. The population has grown yet the courts haven't, and now it's effectively pay to play.
Re:US Supreme Court limits federal judges' power to block Tr...
by everforward on Saturday June 28, 2025 @01:24PM
(#44406433)
Ahh, I mistakenly thought some form of public defenders were appointed in deportation cases. The free lawyers I’ve seen must have been from non-profits.
That is indeed a big issue.
Re:US Supreme Court limits federal judges' power to block Tr...
by malcolmgreaves on Friday June 27, 2025 @05:52PM
(#44400575)
No it’s not the same spot at all. No one will file injunctions. There is also the possibility that another’s court case for the same reason won’t be decided the same way.
What this means is that it’s now ok for the orange man to break the law. Rule of law will only be upheld in very limited circumstances in very limited areas.
So it reads to me like we've ended up in a similar spot, but with the requirement that an insane amount of paperwork happens.