News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I Fought in Ukraine and Here's Why FPV Drones Kind of Suck by paradox242 on Thursday June 26, 2025 @08:08PM (#44392677)
This seems to contradict the article, which among other criticisms, specifically says that these drones are more expensive and less reliable than mortars.
Re:I Fought in Ukraine and Here's Why FPV Drones Kind of Suck by thesmok on Friday June 27, 2025 @03:30AM (#44394530)
There are different calibers of mortar shells, bigger size has more range and power. I think author of the article has cheated by not specifying the caliber, because a 155mm artillery shell cost is more than a $1000, precision guided one cost is tens of thousands. While a drone capable of reaching 10km+ costs less than $1000, without payload.
Re:I Fought in Ukraine and Here's Why FPV Drones Kind of Suck by stogot on Friday June 27, 2025 @05:00AM (#44395118)
Ya I didn’t see where the author discussed how imprecise artillery is vs drones. Aren’t mortars even less precise?
Re:I Fought in Ukraine and Here's Why FPV Drones Kind of Suck by seec on Saturday June 28, 2025 @04:52AM (#44403222)
Of course they are less precise. And in most cases, they need quite a few rounds to adjust their aim at the target, so his comparaison was already stupid unfair.

He takes into account all the drones that don't work and then goes on and pretends artillery is 100% accurate and has an absurdly low cost (at the price he is quoting, they are basically sending grenades).

Let's not even discuss moving target or penetrating inside fortified targets which mortar will never be able to do.

Re:I Fought in Ukraine and Here's Why FPV Drones Kind of Suck by euroderf on Sunday June 29, 2025 @12:38PM (#44414383)
Why are artillery rounds so expensive ? Is it the raw materials ? Is it the precision of machining ? Is it because of what's required to make the entire process safe for workers ?