Re:Early US Intel assessment suggests strikes on Iran did no...
by everfrustrated on Tuesday June 24, 2025 @03:49PM
(#44370297)
How they going to get to them?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Early US Intel assessment suggests strikes on Iran did no...
by 123yawaworht456 on Tuesday June 24, 2025 @04:03PM
(#44370444)
if you're American, watch out for army recruitment ads without the usual DEI flavoring
Re:Early US Intel assessment suggests strikes on Iran did no...
by Loughla on Tuesday June 24, 2025 @04:10PM
(#44370509)
I graduated from a very small high school. There were fewer than 20 guys in my graduating class, fewer than 40 total graduates. I graduated in 2002. 2 guys did not join the military; because of 9/11, the rest felt some kind of patriotic duty to join up.
Of the guys I graduated with, half died either in Iraq or Afghanistan between 2002 and 2006, or killed themselves shortly after returning home. The other half are broken. Either physically or mentally.
We cannot do that again. That we're involved in this shit show is an absolute travesty.
Re:Early US Intel assessment suggests strikes on Iran did no...
by cjbgkagh on Tuesday June 24, 2025 @04:16PM
(#44370566)
“The only thing we learn from history is that we learn nothing from history." - Georg Hegel
Re:Early US Intel assessment suggests strikes on Iran did no...
by heraldgeezer on Tuesday June 24, 2025 @04:15PM
(#44370561)
Already happened hehe
Re:Early US Intel assessment suggests strikes on Iran did no...
by estebank on Tuesday June 24, 2025 @04:02PM
(#44370434)
Are the US and Israel going to continuously bomb any working crew in the area that goes to dig?
Re:Early US Intel assessment suggests strikes on Iran did no...
by gtsop on Tuesday June 24, 2025 @04:22PM
(#44370618)
CL/CB - Continuous Liberation / Continuous Bombing
it's the ci/cd of american foreign poliyics
Re:Early US Intel assessment suggests strikes on Iran did no...
by mcphage on Tuesday June 24, 2025 @08:49PM
(#44372648)
We’re in the BDP stage—Bomb Driven Politics. That’s when you drop the bombs first, and then you have a meeting.
Re:Early US Intel assessment suggests strikes on Iran did no...
by I_Lorem on Tuesday June 24, 2025 @08:12PM
(#44372416)
Murdering PhD's in Nuclear Engineering would be cheaper, and is a continuous Israeli program already.
Re:Early US Intel assessment suggests strikes on Iran did no...
by tonyedgecombe on Tuesday June 24, 2025 @03:56PM
(#44370372)
I presume they will just fire the people who did the assessment.
Re:Early US Intel assessment suggests strikes on Iran did no...
by cjbgkagh on Tuesday June 24, 2025 @04:05PM
(#44370462)
Nukes or ground invasion, the point of the attack wasn’t to knock out the facilities, it was so that Trump can be dragged along ‘reluctantly’ so he can sell the conflict to his base. It is a persuasion technique called mirroring. Trump mirrors the position of the anti-war base, then slowly piece by piece he changes his position. I guess how far it’ll go will depend on how effective the state is at suppressing anti-war sentiment. If history is a guide then the state can be surprisingly effective at this.
Re:Early US Intel assessment suggests strikes on Iran did no...
by ethbr1 on Wednesday June 25, 2025 @04:24PM
(#44381504)
Polling of independents at 60/40 against should scare the shit out of the GOP, if they intend to press this.
I expect there is no desire on Trump's part for a long game, and he just took an isolated opportunity (Iranian air defenses smashed and air force suppressed) to wave the flag and look militaristic.
Limiting the strike to nuclear facilities also provides deniability to Iranian civilians that, unlike Israel, the US isn't looking for a full scale war.