News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:FICO to incorporate buy-now-pay-later loans into credit s... by jvanderbot on Tuesday June 24, 2025 @11:18AM (#44367169)
Credit cards however, can be used to get free stuff from rewards.

Credit loans or payment plans can also be used to get a higher credit score, making the first item easier.

Conversely to your example of credit making cash, Cash can make you money through investing, so Credit can also be used to keep higher amounts of cash on hand when purchases are made. , e.g., buying a car on credit and using the car money to invest. But we're saying the same thing there.

Re:FICO to incorporate buy-now-pay-later loans into credit s... by kiba on Tuesday June 24, 2025 @11:23AM (#44367215)
Credit card rewards are just discounts, discounts that are charged to the merchant. It's not a free lunch by any means.
Re:FICO to incorporate buy-now-pay-later loans into credit s... by BenjiWiebe on Tuesday June 24, 2025 @01:00PM (#44368309)
And as a merchant, yes it's annoying, but it's also nice when a customer pays with a credit card, because we actually get paid then.
Re:FICO to incorporate buy-now-pay-later loans into credit s... by jvanderbot on Tuesday June 24, 2025 @01:24PM (#44368553)
I think that's a technicality. From my perspective 100% discount is called "Free", and I get that a few times a year when flying (tickets, upgrades, etc)

I calculate 100% based on the amount I get from my preferred airline for paying cash for groceries (0) vs the amount I get by using a card they issue (a few imaginary points/$). Then I trade those points for things I couldn't have had by paying cash. As long as I don't pay interest, we're in "Free" territory.

Re:FICO to incorporate buy-now-pay-later loans into credit s... by lxgr on Tuesday June 24, 2025 @06:58PM (#44371959)
No, you’re still paying for all of that to some extent. Less than people carrying a balance and/or paying with cash or debit cards, sure, but more than zero. (It would be a pure redistribution from cash to card payers only if issuers made no profit or even a loss on never-balance-carrying cardholders, but if they didn’t, why would they still have them as customers?)

It’s still the rational thing to do from an individual perspective, of course, which is why these rewards are so sticky.