You think I'm communicating with you, but I'm communicating with the audience, so your disengagement with me is of no concern. You really have nothing to say, and no one is going to take seriously someone whose level of intellectual discourse is to cite support for his claims by writing this string of babbledegook: "hadith it’s behind every rock etc except the blah blah tree."

I wouldn't even dare to say this is the writing level of a kindergartner, because that would be an insult to kindergartners. So flee you fool, Adieu.

P.S.: The multiple desperate edits after saying 'goodbye' twice really sell the whole 'I've demolished your argument' claim. Classic.

P.P.S.: Funny how someone who 'stopped reading at the first sentence' managed to respond to points from my fifth paragraph. Even your lies are lazy.

> "hadith it’s behind every rock etc except the blah blah tree."

It’s enough for our audience to Google and expose you either about being an Islamic scholar or lying about Islam not calling for violence, yet again.

Translation: "I can't actually defend my interpretation, so I'm desperately hoping random people will Google a mangled hadith and somehow reach the same ignorant conclusion I did without understanding the context; all while pretending I'm not still here obsessively responding after saying goodbye three times."

Translation: "I can't actually defend my interpretation, so I'm desperately hoping random people will Google a mangled hadith and get ensnared by the same unscholarly, inflammatory, cheap websites I read to form my understanding; all while pretending I'm not still here obsessively responding after saying goodbye three times."

> I can't actually defend my interpretation

But I can and I did. You read it, remember?

A mangled citation is not a defense of an interpretation. You still have not demonstrated how Islam calls for unrestricted violence against Jews (or any people).

It's not mangled. You know exactly what it refers to. It's mocking your silly belief system and it's conspiracy theories about bushes that support the Yehudis.

Perfect. Can't defend what you actually believe, so now we get the raw bigotry. You just confessed that this whole charade was you 'mocking' rather than making any serious argument. All that pretense about doctrine and scholarship was just cover for your need to spread contempt and hatred. At least you're finally being honest about what kind of pathetic person you are: a coward who hides bigotry behind intellectual theater until cornered.

Bravo! How do the mirrors you look into withstand such a face?

> now we get the raw bigotry

One can’t be bigoted towards ideas. You claimed to be an Islamic scholar, now you don’t seem to know what Islam is.

You still have no substantiated interpretation of how Islam calls for unrestricted violence against Jews, just desperate attempts to make your deceptive behavior sound principled.

This is what is called a wolf in sheep's clothing.

Yes, I have. Have you forgotten your silly conspiracy theory about bushes we discussed earlier in this conversation?

How does it prove Islam calls for unrestricted violence against Jews? Stop mocking and start explaining. If you can't answer this, then you have no argument.