News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SpaceX Starship 36 Anomaly by LorenPechtel on Thursday June 19, 2025 @01:43PM (#44320861)
But this was an explosion on the pad. Something leaked or something broke while not under flight stress.

We also have that Falcon 9 that blew in space due to a leak.

I think they're skimping on quality control.

Re:SpaceX Starship 36 Anomaly by bluescrn on Thursday June 19, 2025 @03:01PM (#44321497)
With this one, given the seething hatred for Musk these days, I wouldn't rule out sabotage.

It's not the most likely cause, but in a world where people have been torching Tesla dealerships, I'm sure there's a lot of people now who really want to see Starship fail.

Re:SpaceX Starship 36 Anomaly by FireBeyond on Thursday June 19, 2025 @03:55PM (#44321987)
I think you're drawing a VERY long bow here. That's a long hustle, to work in a field where you'd get to be an intimate part of the launch control process at a company that is going to be very selective on who it hires because it can be, security clearances, and then be able to do this.

No, it's rocketry. Sometimes things go boom when they're that volatile to begin with.

Re:SpaceX Starship 36 Anomaly by EdwardDiego on Friday June 20, 2025 @05:03AM (#44325845)
Sabotage of a SpaceX rocket, on their own pad?

Long bow bro.

Re:SpaceX Starship 36 Anomaly by inglor_cz on Thursday June 19, 2025 @01:57PM (#44320954)
This is what I have read so far:

https://www.reddit.com/r/spacex/comments/1lfayba/em_update_o...

So yeah, a QC problem, it seems.