If you were to go that way, why not a wire?

Fiber transmits light, not rf. To get power out of fiber optics you have to have a photovoltaic cell on the other side and there's a limit for how much those can produce with such a collaminated light source.

Using fiber optics for power is like trying to make a solar panel generate electricity from a laser beam.

> Using fiber optics for power is like trying to make a solar panel generate electricity from a laser beam.

Isn't that exactly what power beaming is, except typically with frequency range in microwaves instead of visible light?

> except typically with frequency range in microwaves instead of visible light

That's a big freaking deal.

eg, consider WiFi. They choose their bands carefully for wireless standards, and terahertz is pretty far from microwave GHz. I've never seen direct THz synthesis outside of partially-insane radar engineers.

I thought half the controversial scanners since 9/11 were THz (the other half being backscatter X-ray)? Was that just a marketing term?

(I can easily imagine "terahertz for terrorism" being a slogan…)

I have no idea why this might be limited by the light source being collimated?

I mean, you can get electricity from PV illuminated by a laser, and everything I've heard so far says it's easier than with sunlight because you can match the frequency of the laser to the band gap of the PV.

Sure, you absolutely can do it. But material science quickly becomes a major limit.

For something 15% efficient like a high quality PV cell, for every 100 watts you want to be usable on the receiving side, the receiver has to bleed off 566 watts of heat. And that's 566 watts of waste heat that is highly concentrated.

Consider a single residental power circuit. 12A maximum, 120v, that's 1440 watts at delivery. For PV power delivery via laser, that PV would need to dissipate 8 kilowatts of waste heat. One a very small surface

It sounds like you're mistaking PV for a thermal system.

In a PV cell, you have a semiconductor. Semiconductors have this thing called a "band gap", which is the energy needed to get an electron from the valence band to the conduction band: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Band_gap

The limits to efficiency of a solar panel is that sunlight has photons of many energy levels; the photons with energy less than the band gap do nothing, those with more, waste the excess.

A laser can have energy tuned to this band gap, at which point the PV part becomes ~99.9% efficient. (The laser part is not close to that efficiency).

I'm not talking about a thermal system, I'm talking about having to deal with the thermals of your inefficiencies. That energy that doesn't get converted to electricity is converted to heat. And you have to deal with it.

The type of laser based PV that you're taking about that's highly tuned is at maximum 27% efficient. Not 99%.

That's a 73% waste you have to manage

I don't know where you get these ideas from, but they're very very wrong.

You can already buy PV for sunlight with higher efficiency than 27%. Heck, even with a single band gap the limit for *sunlight* with all the problems I've just stated (because a broad spectrum will waste energy and the sun's spectrum is very broad) still gets you to the 33% Shockley–Queisser limit for one junction on the solar spectrum: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shockley–Queisser_limit

But for monochromatic light, tuned to the band gap, stuff people have already built is several times better than that, and the theoretical limit is basically how finely you can tune the laser bandwidth and how precisely you can control impurities that broaden the band gap.

Here's one designed for monochromatic laser use, that was actually built, with results published in early 2019, with 70% where they recon doing it better would get to 80%: https://krichlab.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Xia18-PVSC.pd...

As with all quantum systems, which is what both PV and lasers are, the ultimate efficiency of a tuned laser-and-band-gap pair is as good as your engineering, hence ~99.9% (on the cell side) if you control absolutely all parts of it properly.

just have a tiny steam turbine equivalent...? (some thermoelectric generator) You don't really need to be efficient. You have fans to blow air and dissipate heat on the other end after all

You should do the first round of engineering calculations on this.

"trying to make a solar panel generate electricity from a laser beam" is literally what the article is about.