Re:Show HN - Github competitor with free private repo
by xyzzyb on Friday August 24, 2012 @01:34PM
(#4428608)
I find github compelling enough to pay them for private repos. $84 a year gets me five private repos. If you want to win me (and others like me) over you'll have to sell me an improved experience.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Show HN - Github competitor with free private repo
by tzs on Friday August 24, 2012 @01:51PM
(#4428705)
I sort of understand why people like Github for public projects, but what's compelling for a private project?
Re:Show HN - Github competitor with free private repo
by hzy on Friday August 24, 2012 @02:00PM
(#4428752)
It's a single, unified place to host code with a known-to-be-good experience.
Re:Show HN - Github competitor with free private repo
by xyzzyb on Friday August 24, 2012 @02:08PM
(#4428799)
hzy has it right on the money. It's rock solid and reliable. The built in issues/pull requests/wiki are fantastic. Adding in a collaborator is easy. It's credentials I already heavily use.
Plus, I like github tons so I'm happy to pay.
Re:Show HN - Github competitor with free private repo
by icefox on Friday August 24, 2012 @05:31PM
(#4429787)
One of the most compelling feature of using GitHub for private repositories is developers already know how to use it, already have accounts etc. GitHub has a nice growing moat in that regard.
Re:Show HN - Github competitor with free private repo
by flog on Friday August 24, 2012 @02:29PM
(#4428930)
I find issues and the wiki to be the weak points of github. Fix those.
Re:Show HN - Github competitor with free private repo
by subsection1h on Friday August 24, 2012 @06:48PM
(#4430098)
I find issues and the wiki to be the
weak points of github.
What's wrong with GitHub's wikis?I recently evaluated wiki software that I could use with one of the teams I'm on, and I was surprised when I ended up choosing GitHub's wikis. I love that their wikis support Org Mode's syntax. The only other solution I could find that supports Git and Org Mode's syntax is Gitit, which was my second choice.
I was fully prepared to use Markdown, Textile, or some other lightweight markup language that I consider inferior to Org Mode's syntax, but no wiki solution was good enough to warrant that compromise.