News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Gnome introducing stronger dependencies on systemd by happymellon on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @03:05AM (#44244967)
How were they holding X11 back?

No one wanted to support it, not just Red Hat.

Re:Gnome introducing stronger dependencies on systemd by yolkedgeek on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @03:16AM (#44245018)
Read the news. That's why the maintainers forked it and are starting improvements on their own project.

https://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2025/06/06/msg032...

https://github.com/X11Libre/xserver

Re:Gnome introducing stronger dependencies on systemd by happymellon on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @04:14AM (#44245335)
That reads like someone having a breakdown.

Probably going to regret asking, but what is a "redskirt"?

> doesn't matter which country you're coming from, your politicial views, your race, your sex, your age, your food menu, whether you wear boots or heels, whether you're furry or fairy, Conan or McKay, comic character, a small furry creature from Alpha Centauri, or just an boring average person. Anybody's welcomed, who's interested in bringing X forward.

Whoh. So normally people who talk like this are far from "strong and stable", it's a call for "all lives matter". I wouldn't touch this racist heap.

Re:Gnome introducing stronger dependencies on systemd by bmn__ on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @08:29AM (#44246906)
> > doesn't matter […] your race […] Anybody's welcomed

> I wouldn't touch this racist heap.

You are clearly unhinged. I don't know how to bring you back to sanity, but as the americans say, one cannot reason someone out of a position they have not reasoned themselves into.

Re:Gnome introducing stronger dependencies on systemd by happymellon on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @12:04PM (#44249028)
The developer is an anti-vaxxer, uses obvious misogynistic language and is full of dog whistles toward racist language.

I am perfectly fine.

Re:Gnome introducing stronger dependencies on systemd by bmn__ on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @02:15PM (#44250284)
I notice you choose to shift the goalpost instead of engaging with the central point. The central point, stated clearly and unequivocally, is that the project maintainer wrote he welcomes anybody and does not care about race, and you call this racist, and thus there is a huge contradiction.

I suspect you double down because you are so captured by your emotions that you cannot possibly admit the lapse in critical thinking. I predict going that path won't take you far on HN.

Re:Gnome introducing stronger dependencies on systemd by abenga on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @04:06PM (#44251233)
> he welcomes anybody and does not care about race,

Ah yes, the "all lives matter" rebuttal.

Re:Gnome introducing stronger dependencies on systemd by bmn__ on Thursday June 12, 2025 @01:59AM (#44254657)
What's that supposed to mean?
Re:Gnome introducing stronger dependencies on systemd by abenga on Thursday June 12, 2025 @07:04AM (#44256218)
A common refrain against any attempt to mitigate unjust effects of past racial injustice (affirmative action, protesting against unjust policing, DEI, etc) is that the mitigation itself is racist, and the best thing would be to treat everyone "equally" going forward. Thus the "all lives matter" and "we welcome everybody regardless of race" are the same coin.
Re:Gnome introducing stronger dependencies on systemd by happymellon on Friday June 13, 2025 @02:02AM (#44266065)
Re:Gnome introducing stronger dependencies on systemd by morsch on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @03:43AM (#44245165)
Re:Gnome introducing stronger dependencies on systemd by biorach on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @03:26AM (#44245073)
> Read the news. That's why the maintainers forked it

It looks more like one maintainer, and it's really not clear if his problem was with corporate control, or if he just fell out with everybody.

Re:Gnome introducing stronger dependencies on systemd by biorach on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @04:55AM (#44245578)
I've read some more. He's just nuts. Your talking nonsense.
Re:Gnome introducing stronger dependencies on systemd by henearkr on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @04:04AM (#44245276)
I love the idea to fork X11 if it can accelerate its development or maintenance, however in this precise case it looks like the developer who created the fork has questionable opinions about e.g. DEI, vaccines, etc, but more importantly it looks like he is willing to include references to his opinions inside the project (cf the README.md)...

So, it would be awesome if somebody would just go ahead and re-fork it removing just the controversial stuff.

Re:Gnome introducing stronger dependencies on systemd by ibotty on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @03:27AM (#44245085)
Not a maintainer. A disgruntled developer. And one with questionable patches. Please read the gitlab discussions before coming to this conclusion.
Re:Gnome introducing stronger dependencies on systemd by pcpuser on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @03:26AM (#44245072)
Nah man you don't get it. They were "monetizing" Wayland. Whatever that means. It's certainly not because X is an insanely old and difficult to maintain codebase with questionable design decisions.
Re:Gnome introducing stronger dependencies on systemd by cardanome on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @06:24AM (#44246054)
Give me an option to donate directly to X11 development and I am gonna support it.
Re:Gnome introducing stronger dependencies on systemd by happymellon on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @06:39AM (#44246139)
Give directly to X11 development? You'll need to find someone who actually wants to work on the codebase, and then you can donate to them?

No one wants to work on it.

Re:Gnome introducing stronger dependencies on systemd by cardanome on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @08:26AM (#44246880)
There is lots of work no ones wants to do in their free time. That is why you pay people money.

And why wouldn't someone be happy working on X11? It is an open source project, it is high impact work. I would jump at it instantly if someone paid me a competitive wage to do it. Or honestly even a bit under my normal expectation. Not every person wants to work on some ego-driven rewrite of a rewrite. Some people are fine working with legacy code.

Also there is a counter example right above my post. Someone was so motivated to work on it, they even forked it: https://github.com/X11Libre/xserver

Granted the fork seems weirdly ideologically motivated but anyway, case in point.

Re:Gnome introducing stronger dependencies on systemd by growse on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @08:32AM (#44246932)
So with the plethora of people who care about progress and its success, and the army of people willing to work on it for a competitive wage, we should be seeing lots of activity on the project, right?

> Give me an option to donate directly to X11 development and I am gonna support it.

> I would jump at it instantly if someone paid me a competitive wage to do it

You guys should meet up.