Very similar design already used by Wing. I'm guessing they did a fair bit of analysis and modeling of the cost, range, complexity, safety, etc. etc. tradeoffs before settling on what they're using currently.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wing_Aviation#/media/File:Wing...

Two impressive things about Wing's design are 1) load paths are designed to break the airframe in controlled ways 2) the 4 blade props have alternating shorter and longer blades for quieter aeroacoustics

Adam Savage did a video tour of their factory recently, worth a watch

> Adam Savage did a video tour of their factory recently, worth a watch

Thanks! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BXm6dTHvY0

I'm a big Waymo and Wing fan, but hadn't seen that.

It's great, check out the Slo Mo guys video from that same tour for the prop smoke vortex https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yaAFLpLmVg

It's actually not a terrible inefficiency.

With this config, the cruise motors and prop are optimally sized for cruise - which gives non trivial gains to both eta for propulsive motor efficiency and prop efficiency.

Vs a tiltrotor/wing/body in which the cruise motor has to do double duty as lifting motors. Given it takes anywhere from ~4-7x more power to hover (depending on disc loading) than to cruise, you can see how the motors are not in an optimal throttle/rpm band in this case. Archer's CTO Munoz has actually said this publicly.

Adding a tiltrotor mechanism is surely not worth the added complexity and weight, in this case. You're right though on the added weight and drag from having separate motors and props.

And also iteration cycles slow down, adds cost to development and qualification if making them in-house for larger prototypes.

And the weight (and drag) penalty is ~5% given the actuators and subassemblies for tilting don't come for free either.

This is also the most the penalty will ever be as electric motors continue increasing in specific power, and quite rapidly this century so far.

Shameless plug: https://aliptera.com/

Tilt-rotor on all 4 motors with an extra twist: the wing shape adds to the lift in vertical mode, so you can use smaller motors, so they're more efficient even in horizontal mode.

What exactly do you mean by

> the wing shape adds to the lift in vertical mode

Wings require airspeed to work, which there presumably aren't a lot of in vertical mode.

Looks like an autogyro. Which are quite efficient.

There are lots of DIY variations on the theme -- here's one: https://hackaday.com/2022/08/22/optimising-a-rc-tilt-rotor-v...