Re:Marines mobilized in response to LA protests
by fenomas on Tuesday June 10, 2025 @07:59AM
(#44235705)
The fact that it meant something else to someone else is, if you look closely, the entire point of the anecdote.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Marines mobilized in response to LA protests
by thaumasiotes on Tuesday June 10, 2025 @09:25AM
(#44236514)
And the phrasing, "Apparently, ...", presents this as if it was hard to foresee. It was definitely not hard to foresee.
Re:Marines mobilized in response to LA protests
by ceejayoz on Tuesday June 10, 2025 @12:04PM
(#44238450)
What is easy to forsee in a conference room is not as easy to forsee in a crowded street with tear gas and shouting and rubber bullets flying.
Re:Marines mobilized in response to LA protests
by thaumasiotes on Tuesday June 10, 2025 @03:23PM
(#44240430)
But, again, Ken White seems to be having trouble seeing it in retrospect. Is that not weird? The tweet is phrased to suggest that the Marines are using unusual terminology. They aren't.
Re:Marines mobilized in response to LA protests
by ceejayoz on Tuesday June 10, 2025 @03:52PM
(#44240742)
You'll find Popehat is a heavily sarcastic poster.
Read it in the sense of "I told my toddler they can't have ice cream three times a day and apparently that makes me a meanie".
Re:Marines mobilized in response to LA protests
by CogitoCogito on Tuesday June 10, 2025 @03:39PM
(#44240600)
"Apparently..." would have been the perfect way to describe my reaction. I didn't realize that "cover me" meant "lay down suppressing fire" to Marines. I guess it makes sense, but that's not the meaning I would have expected. So I would probably have been just as confused as the cops in the story. I wouldn't be surprised if most cops would have been similarly confused.
So yeah in conclusion, I don't really understand the point you're trying to make.
Re:Marines mobilized in response to LA protests
by margalabargala on Tuesday June 10, 2025 @10:15AM
(#44237070)
And yet it apparently was hard to foresee for at least one crucial person...