Re:World fertility rates in 'unprecedented decline', UN says
by morsch on Tuesday June 10, 2025 @01:55AM
(#44233054)
That was my reaction as well. They're probably referring to something along these lines: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3665046
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:World fertility rates in 'unprecedented decline', UN says
by mdeeks on Tuesday June 10, 2025 @02:03AM
(#44233117)
Doesn't this study say that it had a very low impact?
> they led to a permanent reduction of approximately 8,000 births in the same year, and 145,000 fewer births since 1980
Re:World fertility rates in 'unprecedented decline', UN says
by alexey-salmin on Tuesday June 10, 2025 @02:15AM
(#44233202)
The paper also estimates the number of children saved at 57 per year, so the safety impact is even lower
Re:World fertility rates in 'unprecedented decline', UN says
by morsch on Tuesday June 10, 2025 @06:44AM
(#44235111)
Let's call it 80 and you get a rate of 1:100 children saved per children not conceived. What would be a reasonable rate in your mind?
Re:World fertility rates in 'unprecedented decline', UN says
by Yossarrian22 on Tuesday June 10, 2025 @09:11AM
(#44236373)
Car seat design has improved you can readily fit three car seats in most vehicles these days
Re:World fertility rates in 'unprecedented decline', UN says
by baseballdork on Tuesday June 10, 2025 @10:20AM
(#44237125)
This is a weirdly funny thread. How many theoretical children would you trade for 1 real child? All over a car seat that perhaps prevented 4,000 additional births a year?