News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I think I'm done thinking about GenAI for now by surgical_fire on Thursday June 05, 2025 @04:01PM (#44195272)
> AI has the most effect for people with less experience or low performance. It has less of an effect for people on the high end.

I actually think that it benefits high performance workers as AI can do a lot of heavy lifting that frees them to focus on things where their skills make a difference.

Also, for less skilled or less experienced developers, they will have a harder time spotting the mistakes and inconsistencies generated by AI. This can actually become a productivity sink.

Re:I think I'm done thinking about GenAI for now by windows2020 on Thursday June 05, 2025 @04:19PM (#44195408)
Reading other people's code is often more challenging than writing it yourself.
Re:I think I'm done thinking about GenAI for now by mewpmewp2 on Thursday June 05, 2025 @06:01PM (#44196190)
With AI code I find it very easy to understand as I prompted it, I know what to expect, I know what it will likely do. Far easier than other people code.
Re:I think I'm done thinking about GenAI for now by jessoteric on Thursday June 05, 2025 @04:41PM (#44195583)
the main issue is that you end up looking down the barrel of begging claude, for the fifth time this session, to do it right- or just do it yourself in half the total time you've wasted so far.

at least, this is what i typically end up with.

Re:I think I'm done thinking about GenAI for now by surgical_fire on Thursday June 05, 2025 @07:41PM (#44196643)
Typically, I've been asking it to do "heavy lifting" for me.

It generally generates defective code, but it doesn't really matter all that much, it is still useful that it is mostly right, and I only need to make a few adjustments. It saves me a lot of typing.

Would I pay for it? Probably not. But it is included in my IntelliJ subscription, so why not? It is there already.