Bus stops here: Shanghai lets riders design their own routes

Re:Bus stops here: Shanghai lets riders design their own routes by zem on Friday May 16, 2025 @01:05PM (#44007695)

it's philosophically wrong to say "you need to buy a phone, give some company your personal information, and pay for connectivity on a recurring basis, simply to be able to use a public service"

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bus stops here: Shanghai lets riders design their own routes by ProllyInfamous on Tuesday May 20, 2025 @07:15PM (#44046861)

As I only park downtown once per quarter (metered by a phone app), so far I've not been cited. When it does finally happen:

I plan to become plaintiff in my third civil suit against a mid-sized US city (this one: for requiring cell phone / app to park). I know this sounds petty AF, but I have plenty of free time to help correct this philosophical setback [app parking] with precedent. Dare I say to consider this `moral imperative` =D

During a civil action approximately two years ago (in a state Chancery Court), I had to sign an affadavid that "I don't use/have email" ... because Judge didn't believe me (a form `REQUIRED` it)!

I've filed most my court briefs using a typewriter, which is conversation-inducing (to say the least). As a pro se litigant, the courts are still required to accept paper copies =P

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bus stops here: Shanghai lets riders design their own routes by zem on Tuesday May 20, 2025 @08:32PM (#44047263)

that is truly fighting the good fight :) good on you.

[ Parent | on HN ]