News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Firefox Moves to GitHub by enos_feedler on Tuesday May 13, 2025 @02:18AM (#43970050)
And how are we suppose to solve this problem? By creating distributed versions of every possible component of every piece of software? Seems unrealistic. I think we should be grateful that the core underlying protocol for the most important data has the distributed properties we want. It's a lot more than we can say vs. lots of other platforms out there.
Re:Firefox Moves to GitHub by hnlmorg on Tuesday May 13, 2025 @02:51AM (#43970202)
As a GitHub user myself, I don’t disagree with your point. However I’d like to say that this isn’t quiet as different a problem to solve as it might first appear:

The issue tracking can be a branch and then you just need a compatible UI. In fact some git front ends do exactly this.

CI/CD does already exist in git via githooks. And you’re already better off using make/just/yarn/whatever for your scripts and rely as little on YAML as possible. It’s just a pity that githooks require users to set up each time so many people simply don’t bother.

Re:Firefox Moves to GitHub by groestl on Tuesday May 13, 2025 @02:29AM (#43970087)
> And how are we suppose to solve this problem? By creating distributed versions of every possible component of every piece of software? Seems unrealistic.

That's how we started out.

Re:Firefox Moves to GitHub by baq on Tuesday May 13, 2025 @02:57AM (#43970252)
Maybe that's the reason everything tends to get centralized.
Re:Firefox Moves to GitHub by groestl on Tuesday May 13, 2025 @06:16AM (#43971381)
It's an emergent phenomenon, it requires less energy expenditure overall. It's also the way of the Dodo.
Re:Firefox Moves to GitHub by int_19h on Tuesday May 13, 2025 @05:27AM (#43971124)
By storing issues etc in the repo itself. A git repo is just a generic object graph, after all, and objects don't necessarily describe files.

There are several such solutions already. The problem is that neither of them is popular enough to become a de facto standard. And, of course, centralized git providers like GitHub have a vested interest in keeping in this way, so they are unlikely to support any such solution even if it does become popular enough.

Re:Firefox Moves to GitHub by enos_feedler on Tuesday May 13, 2025 @06:16PM (#43978369)
Wouldn’t it make economic sense for a git host to emerge that just did things this way and collect big pay for it? Gits been around forever and you’re idea sounds simple enough that a market of people would probably choose it on principle. There must be something more fundamental at play here.