Re:Show HN: VectorVFS, your filesystem as a vector database
by foobiekr on Monday May 05, 2025 @07:01PM
(#43900245)
Microsoft poured at least $100M into this hole with nothing to show for it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Show HN: VectorVFS, your filesystem as a vector database
by Ericson2314 on Monday May 05, 2025 @08:58PM
(#43900881)
That doesn't disprove anything for me. It just says POSIX DOS lowest common denominator network effects are a hell of a drug.
Whenever we're talking about interfaces, coordination success or failure is the name of the game.
Re:Show HN: VectorVFS, your filesystem as a vector database
by foobiekr on Monday May 05, 2025 @10:14PM
(#43901220)
What problem do you think a DB-as-filesystem solves? The only obvious one that makes any sense at all is cross-file transactions.
Re:Show HN: VectorVFS, your filesystem as a vector database
by Ericson2314 on Tuesday May 06, 2025 @10:34AM
(#43905617)
The filesystem is a bad database
Directories are a shitty underpowered way to organize data?
No good transactions
Conflation of different needs such as atomic replace vs log-structured
I would like to use a better database instead.
Re:Show HN: VectorVFS, your filesystem as a vector database
by foobiekr on Tuesday May 06, 2025 @11:08AM
(#43905994)
Would you pay 50x performance decrease?
Re:Show HN: VectorVFS, your filesystem as a vector database
by Ericson2314 on Tuesday May 06, 2025 @12:00PM
(#43906638)
No, and I would also not need to.