News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: VectorVFS, your filesystem as a vector database by Ericson2314 on Monday May 05, 2025 @05:17PM (#43899535)
Yeah I am talking more deep architecture, and BeOS is more notable here mostly on just the user-interface level.

However, I think it is reasonable to think that with way more time and money, these things would meet up. Think about it as digging a tunnel from both sides of the mountain.

Re:Show HN: VectorVFS, your filesystem as a vector database by foobiekr on Monday May 05, 2025 @07:01PM (#43900245)
Microsoft poured at least $100M into this hole with nothing to show for it.
Re:Show HN: VectorVFS, your filesystem as a vector database by Ericson2314 on Monday May 05, 2025 @08:58PM (#43900881)
That doesn't disprove anything for me. It just says POSIX DOS lowest common denominator network effects are a hell of a drug.

Whenever we're talking about interfaces, coordination success or failure is the name of the game.

Re:Show HN: VectorVFS, your filesystem as a vector database by foobiekr on Monday May 05, 2025 @10:14PM (#43901220)
What problem do you think a DB-as-filesystem solves? The only obvious one that makes any sense at all is cross-file transactions.
Re:Show HN: VectorVFS, your filesystem as a vector database by Ericson2314 on Tuesday May 06, 2025 @10:34AM (#43905617)
The filesystem is a bad database

Directories are a shitty underpowered way to organize data?

No good transactions

Conflation of different needs such as atomic replace vs log-structured

I would like to use a better database instead.

Re:Show HN: VectorVFS, your filesystem as a vector database by foobiekr on Tuesday May 06, 2025 @11:08AM (#43905994)
Would you pay 50x performance decrease?
Re:Show HN: VectorVFS, your filesystem as a vector database by Ericson2314 on Tuesday May 06, 2025 @12:00PM (#43906638)
No, and I would also not need to.