News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. atto... by freen on Friday April 25, 2025 @08:53PM (#43799947)
Anecdote != evidence.

Also, your anecdote is specifically about a social media article about an attempt to use social media spaces to harass people.

Seems extra “special case” to me.

Re:Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. atto... by LightHugger on Saturday April 26, 2025 @05:18AM (#43802080)
Gamergate was not related to harassment, it was a leftist consumer action movement about unethical yellow journalism, that then obviously got smeared by the yellow journalists they criticized.

It's one of those things where honest sources exist but you have to be somewhat good at seeing contradictions and lies, then being willing to discard liars as uncredible. It's not like archives of the supposed "harassment" sites don't exist anymore either, in those days it was mostly progressive leftists posting on the 8chan threads despite being maligned as a right wing center of evil or whatever. Sometimes the truth is just so absurdly and dramatically different from what yellow journalists purport but people are just too lazy and stupid to look into it themselves. After all "who cares it's just video games" (and yet this campaign of dishonesty turned a generation against the dem party in the US and likely contributed to trump's election)

Re:Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. atto... by santoshalper on Saturday April 26, 2025 @05:44AM (#43802186)
I think your view of gamergate is absolutely fucking delusional. I watched it all go down in real time like many of us did. Saying Gamergate was about ethics in games journalism is roughly as accurate as saying the US Civil War was about "states rights". In that it is kinda sorta technically true if you ignore 99% of what was actually happening.
Re:Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. atto... by freen on Saturday April 26, 2025 @02:12PM (#43805852)
Gamergate folks are incredibly silent about other “ethics in Journalism” issues…

Same with all those “free speech wing of the free speech party” folks.

Re:Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. atto... by LightHugger on Saturday April 26, 2025 @06:55PM (#43807984)
You mean you watched people writing misinformation articles smearing people in realtime, or were you actually on the hubs where gamergate was organized? There is a big difference between these things, and no there were not people organizing for "misogyny campaigns" the discussion was 99% corruption and ethics focused. Especially in gaming circles of 2014 which were very progressive.

Quite frankly i find people who think there were actually some kind of organized misogyny campaigns in 2014 to be a form of insane, like something breaks inside a person because they need a bogeyman so badly that it becomes a core of their being even though it's incredibly irrational. At the time journalists would just take random twitter people who weren't affiliated with gamergate and hold them up as if they represented the movement. Reminds of me the tactics used against occupy wall street honestly. It's not a rational or reasonable belief.

Re:Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. atto... by lobotomizer on Saturday April 26, 2025 @10:34AM (#43803997)
Pass me the crack pipe brotha
Re:Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. atto... by nulld3v on Saturday April 26, 2025 @10:48AM (#43804134)
"Gamergate was actually 8chan communists fighting sensasionalist journalism but their message was then twisted and used against them to push people into far-right MAGA."

Amazing... I can't tell if you are trolling or seriously think this.

Re:Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. atto... by LightHugger on Saturday April 26, 2025 @06:50PM (#43807942)
Communists no, young progressives yes. It's kind of insane to believe that a majority audience of gamers in the year 2014 would be anything but progressive, at least until the entire media turned on them and orchestrated a misinformation campaign out of a combination of a core of malice then a majority of laziness.