News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:You Wouldn't Steal a Font by vunderba on Wednesday April 23, 2025 @09:40PM (#43778520)
> A typeface does not have a meaningful functional role in a document

100% incorrect. There are fonts that are made specifically to increase legibility for a dyslexic audience. If that's not a functional role than I don't know what is.

Re:You Wouldn't Steal a Font by tptacek on Wednesday April 23, 2025 @09:43PM (#43778527)
Oh for God's sake. You also can't set an instruction manual entirely in DIN Grindel Milk. The implied subtext was the functional equivalence of free and unfree display fonts. The most popular dyslexia font in the world is free.
Re:You Wouldn't Steal a Font by vunderba on Wednesday April 23, 2025 @09:46PM (#43778542)
Ah that's my bad, I read the first statement without seeing that you prefaced it with "as compared to free alternatives".
Re:You Wouldn't Steal a Font by tptacek on Wednesday April 23, 2025 @09:56PM (#43778592)
Sorry for coming at you that hard, it just felt like a gotcha. But we both misread each other!
Re:You Wouldn't Steal a Font by mrob on Thursday April 24, 2025 @09:55AM (#43782875)
One dyslexia font was tested and found to have the same legibility as normal fonts:

"Dyslexie font neither benefits nor impedes the reading process of children with and without dyslexia."

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11881-017-0154-6

I'm skeptical that any of these fonts actually make a difference. (Although if you like Comic Sans, you might as well continue using it; it doesn't do any harm.)