News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:First hormone-free male birth control pill enters human t... by badgersnake on Sunday April 20, 2025 @05:22PM (#43746625)
This is why it won’t succeed. The person getting pregnant is going to want some proof that the contraception is being used properly. And that means something that they can see or something that they do themselves.
Re:First hormone-free male birth control pill enters human t... by Cthulhu_ on Sunday April 20, 2025 @05:41PM (#43746720)
Exactly. I'm confident women worry a lot more about getting pregnant than men worry about getting someone pregnant.
Re:First hormone-free male birth control pill enters human t... by crazygringo on Sunday April 20, 2025 @06:19PM (#43746925)
You don't think men worry about having a kid with someone they don't want to, being responsible for 18 years of child support, making hard decisions about whether they want to be involved in the kid's life, etc.?

Men are terrified of getting someone pregnant. At least women have a choice as to what to do about it. If they don't want to keep it, they don't, assuming the law permits it or the law is easy to get around. Men don't ever have that choice.

Re:First hormone-free male birth control pill enters human t... by giantg2 on Monday April 21, 2025 @12:01AM (#43748411)
Anecdotal polling from my peer group strongly suggests you are wrong. Every guy I know would rather be responsible for taking an equivalent pill than the woman taking it. Every single one of us has experienced one or more women who missed taking the pill a day here or there and those women weren't that concerned about it. As an add-on (depending on jurisdiction), women have the backup of the abortion decision whereas men do not.
Re:First hormone-free male birth control pill enters human t... by adrianmonk on Sunday April 20, 2025 @09:13PM (#43747747)
That's a solid argument for why a male birth control pill won't substitute for a female birth control pill.

But I don't think it needs to in order to succeed. For women, the stakes are higher. For men, they're still high enough. There's no reason both people can't be on the pill. Yes, it's a bit redundant, but when your goal is safety, redundancy is usually good.

"Trust me, babe, you won't get pregnant because I'm on the (male) pill!" is going to be tough sell in the bedroom. But "guys, control your own fate with a once-daily pill!" will be an easy sell in the inevitable TV ads.

Re:First hormone-free male birth control pill enters human t... by giantg2 on Monday April 21, 2025 @12:04AM (#43748419)
I would agree for casual sex, but I don't think this stays true for committed relationships.
Re:First hormone-free male birth control pill enters human t... by herbst on Monday April 21, 2025 @04:15AM (#43749492)
Do you ask woman for proof that they took their pills properly? Do they photo proof it daily to you?
Re:First hormone-free male birth control pill enters human t... by cthalupa on Monday April 21, 2025 @10:24AM (#43752370)
I don't want to get someone pregnant. If I can take a pill to largely ensure this is the case, I'm going to take a pill.

Hell, if I'm engaging in casual sex, I'm going to take both the pill and wear a condom. I've had condoms break and not notice it immediately - thankfully never at the point where I've reached climax, but I could see it happening.