News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Librarians Are Dangerous by nothrabannosir on Saturday April 19, 2025 @02:55PM (#43738572)
Clear meaning: yes. But idiomatic? I have to protest XD

Could care less has indeed left the barn by now and I could care less (as you can tell) but mixing up understate and overstate? I hope we’re in time to stop this horse.

Re:Librarians Are Dangerous by soulofmischief on Saturday April 19, 2025 @03:16PM (#43738705)
I agree and I'm glad I was corrected.

I think we lost the plot once "unloosen" and "loosen" started meaning the same thing: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/unloosen

Re:Librarians Are Dangerous by nothrabannosir on Saturday April 19, 2025 @04:13PM (#43739133)
(for the record it's all inconsequential pedantry and in good cheer :) thanks for being a good sport)
Re:Librarians Are Dangerous by Nifty3929 on Saturday April 19, 2025 @04:54PM (#43739394)
Don't get me started on "try and"
Re:Librarians Are Dangerous by GTP on Saturday April 19, 2025 @06:04PM (#43739845)
Try and get started :D
Re:Librarians Are Dangerous by stavros on Saturday April 19, 2025 @05:01PM (#43739436)
"Idiomatic" is idiomatic usage for "wrong".
Re:Librarians Are Dangerous by sunshowers on Sunday April 20, 2025 @07:12AM (#43743045)
What? In this context, idiomatic just means the kinds of expressions that native speakers would use. (The term also applies to programming languages.)

By definition, native speakers aren't wrong. If your model doesn't match observed reality, it is the model that's at issue, not reality.

Re:Librarians Are Dangerous by dredmorbius on Saturday April 19, 2025 @05:30PM (#43739628)
We can take the horse that's fled the now-closed barn door to water, but can we make it think?