News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Librarians Are Dangerous by lurk2 on Saturday April 19, 2025 @01:04PM (#43737690)
This reads like the sort of self-congratulatory articles journalists were fond of writing about themselves in the late-2010s, just as public trust in journalism was reaching an all-time low.

I suspect the same thing is happening with librarians as they’ve begun to abandon all pretence of being impartial guardians of information in favor of larping as members of The Resistance. Ironically, the experts never seem to learn that you can only play this game for so long before no one cares what you have to say anymore.

Re:Librarians Are Dangerous by amanaplanacanal on Saturday April 19, 2025 @03:46PM (#43738944)
Resistance against book banners has always been part of their core ideology, there is nothing new about that.
Re:Librarians Are Dangerous by lurk2 on Saturday April 19, 2025 @04:16PM (#43739151)
They are not resisting anything.
Re:Librarians Are Dangerous by FrontierProject on Monday April 21, 2025 @08:04AM (#43750964)
Nothing huh? I guess I'm hallucinating a literal percentage point of the country hitting the streets every weekend.
Re:Librarians Are Dangerous by anannymoose on Sunday April 20, 2025 @08:17AM (#43743313)
No one is banning books, you can go buy as many copies as you want yourself and no one will come for them or you.

Forced spending on garbage content is not a human right.

Re:Librarians Are Dangerous by spartanatreyu on Monday April 21, 2025 @07:30PM (#43757609)
> No one is banning books

This is the part where you lost everyone

Re:Librarians Are Dangerous by hitekker on Saturday April 19, 2025 @10:41PM (#43741141)
I thought you were harsh, but then I read this piece:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/peel-school-board-lib...

It's dispiriting to see librarians distort a normal process (deaccession) to cover up their own book banning.

Re:Librarians Are Dangerous by defrost on Saturday April 19, 2025 @10:48PM (#43741164)
In the article librarians talk about the normal process of weeding out old books, duplicates of rare accesses, etc.

The article itself contrasts that with school boards directing librarians to remove far more than tha regular weeding.

The boards set policy that the librarians are compelled to follow or risk being fired.

Re:Librarians Are Dangerous by remram on Sunday April 20, 2025 @09:44AM (#43743725)
This is not written by either a journalist or a librarian, so I don't understand your comment at all.
Re:Librarians Are Dangerous by lurk2 on Sunday April 20, 2025 @12:09PM (#43744664)
> This is not written by either a journalist or a librarian

I never claimed that it was.

Re:Librarians Are Dangerous by selfhoster on Sunday April 20, 2025 @11:25AM (#43744379)
Agreed, I'm glad you stated it so eloquently. I was going to comment but it would have been a more guttural reaction and not well received I'm sure.