News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Audiobooks vs. Printed Books: a debate as a reader and an... by wintermutestwin on Wednesday April 16, 2025 @03:54AM (#43702677)
Why is there no Spotify for audiobooks? Audible’s pricing model is stupid. I guess the bean counters know better than I, but I imagine there are a lot of people like me who just shrug and listen to what I can get for free through my library’s Libby access. I would gladly pay 15$ a month for unlimited.
Re:Audiobooks vs. Printed Books: a debate as a reader and an... by _glass on Wednesday April 16, 2025 @04:29AM (#43702931)
They do though: https://www.spotify.com/us/audiobooks 15h per month at least.
Re:Audiobooks vs. Printed Books: a debate as a reader and an... by fnordian_slip on Wednesday April 16, 2025 @05:58AM (#43703462)
15h per month? Even without heavy listening, this sounds really low, doesn't it? And if you want to listen to a series if books, like Malazan book of the Fallen at 388h, you wouldn't know anything about the start by the time you are finished, as it's been two years. I would expect that most casual listeners who only listen to half an hour of content a day instead listen mainly to podcasts?

At least that's what I do when I don't have the time for audiobooks. But maybe I shouldn't generalize from my own experience, as everyone is different. For me, audible + the occasional torrent works quite well, and I wouldn't like to use the Spotify interface for audiobooks anyway, considering how bad it is for that use case.

Re:Audiobooks vs. Printed Books: a debate as a reader and an... by rigrassm on Thursday April 17, 2025 @03:33PM (#43721155)
Immediately had the same reaction, 15h is less than most of my books runtimes.

I checked out the FAQs on that page and apparently the 15 hours is just included with the Spotify premium subscription and that let's you listen to 15 hours of anything in their catalog.

Separate from that, you can also purchase books outright and it seems listening to those purchased books won't count towards that 15 Hours.

In that context, those 15 hours are actually kinda appealing to me since it would let you listen to more than the 5 min sample of a book you get on Audible before deciding to outright buy it or you could use that time to listen to a couple shorter books every month without having to purchase it.

Think I might have just convinced myself to look into it a bit more lol (I'm curious how good their catalogue is compared to Audibles)

Re:Audiobooks vs. Printed Books: a debate as a reader and an... by nes350 on Wednesday April 16, 2025 @05:21AM (#43703276)
Storytel is pretty popular in Europe
Re:Audiobooks vs. Printed Books: a debate as a reader and an... by lucumo on Wednesday April 16, 2025 @05:39AM (#43703358)
There are quite a few services like that. Though they resemble video-streamers a bit more, in that not everything is available everywhere. There's a lot of books that are only available in certain countries, and also a lot of books that are only available on certain services.

I use Storytel myself. It's available in many countries. I think it's one of the best services out there for the unlimited listeners.

Re:Audiobooks vs. Printed Books: a debate as a reader and an... by willis936 on Wednesday April 16, 2025 @07:32AM (#43704036)
Libby is great, but the wait times for popular books is heavy.

I use libro.fm. It doesn't have a subscriber model, but they give you DRM-free audio files.