Re:Half the men in Seattle are never-married singles, census...
by toshinoriyagi on Sunday April 13, 2025 @11:07AM
(#43673337)
Isn't this all solved by just filing separately, not jointly?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Half the men in Seattle are never-married singles, census...
by guitarsteve on Sunday April 13, 2025 @11:22AM
(#43673435)
No, for taxes, married filing separately is a different category than single. Married filing separately results in a higher tax bill than married filing jointly for most couples.
Re:Half the men in Seattle are never-married singles, census...
by delecti on Sunday April 13, 2025 @11:29AM
(#43673488)
Married filed separately effectively locks you out of a lot of benefits when compared to unmarried filing single, or married filing jointly.
Re:Half the men in Seattle are never-married singles, census...
by oidar on Sunday April 13, 2025 @11:11AM
(#43673360)
Nope. It's a reason some might note get married.
Re:Half the men in Seattle are never-married singles, census...
by ultrasaurus on Sunday April 13, 2025 @01:52PM
(#43674542)
There are places in the tax code where Single != Married Filing Separately.
One pertinent example is that Washington State's capital gains tax applies after $270k per single person, per married couple filing jointly OR split in half for married filing separately. Which could be a theoretical $18.9k/year difference in taxes.