News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Half the men in Seattle are never-married singles, census... by georgeburdell on Sunday April 13, 2025 @10:52AM (#43673220)
I do want to point out that never-married by looking at legal paperwork is a blunt instrument. There are reasons, especially for dual high earners, to not get a marriage license. Examples of tax-related things that don’t double when married;

-Income tax brackets above about $200k

-SALT cap

-Mortgage interest deduction

-HSA contributions (if have children)

-Dependent care FSA contributions

Re:Half the men in Seattle are never-married singles, census... by Spooky23 on Sunday April 13, 2025 @11:04AM (#43673313)
Yeah this sort of analysis really requires survey data. As a widowed male, i gained an appreciation of the complexity of things.

I’m not dating someone young enough to be my daughter, so the pool of available women consists of divorcees, widows, long-term single and various flavors of married and dating. Divorced people and widows have strong incentives, as spousal support and survivors benefits for children are contingent on not being married.

Also, if you’re not planning to have children with a partner and have money that’s worth litigating over, (or property that was your late spouse that should go to a child) marriage complicates that.

Re:Half the men in Seattle are never-married singles, census... by trollbridge on Sunday April 13, 2025 @11:28AM (#43673482)
Yep. I’d be eligible for more government benefits and pay lower taxes if I weren’t married. It would also be easier to set up various aspects of a business such as officers, etc since we would not be considered “related”.
Re:Half the men in Seattle are never-married singles, census... by toshinoriyagi on Sunday April 13, 2025 @11:07AM (#43673337)
Isn't this all solved by just filing separately, not jointly?
Re:Half the men in Seattle are never-married singles, census... by guitarsteve on Sunday April 13, 2025 @11:22AM (#43673435)
No, for taxes, married filing separately is a different category than single. Married filing separately results in a higher tax bill than married filing jointly for most couples.
Re:Half the men in Seattle are never-married singles, census... by delecti on Sunday April 13, 2025 @11:29AM (#43673488)
Married filed separately effectively locks you out of a lot of benefits when compared to unmarried filing single, or married filing jointly.
Re:Half the men in Seattle are never-married singles, census... by oidar on Sunday April 13, 2025 @11:11AM (#43673360)
Nope. It's a reason some might note get married.
Re:Half the men in Seattle are never-married singles, census... by ultrasaurus on Sunday April 13, 2025 @01:52PM (#43674542)
There are places in the tax code where Single != Married Filing Separately.

One pertinent example is that Washington State's capital gains tax applies after $270k per single person, per married couple filing jointly OR split in half for married filing separately. Which could be a theoretical $18.9k/year difference in taxes.

Re:Half the men in Seattle are never-married singles, census... by lostmsu on Monday April 14, 2025 @10:19AM (#43681633)
Yeah, that particular deduction reeks of some big brain energy. My family is going to be outta here by the end of the year, hopefully.
Re:Half the men in Seattle are never-married singles, census... by mindslight on Sunday April 13, 2025 @11:07AM (#43673336)
- Collapsing two legal entities into effectively one. In the days of the healthcare cartel and other hyperfinancialized shakedowns, this seems like a poor idea. Corpos hire armies of lawyers to create new legal entities so their owners can escape liability. It seems foolish to sign a piece of paper that undermines your main access to that dynamic.
Re:Half the men in Seattle are never-married singles, census... by kmeisthax on Sunday April 13, 2025 @11:42AM (#43673596)
The Sybil attack reigns supreme!