Re:Bluesky's Quest to Build Nontoxic Social Media
by SanjayMehta on Monday April 07, 2025 @07:55AM
(#43610261)
Their concept of shared blocklists is quite fascinating; designed to reinforce group think.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Bluesky's Quest to Build Nontoxic Social Media
by diggan on Monday April 07, 2025 @08:04AM
(#43610326)
Since moderation of some sort is pretty essential on the open web today, you can either subscribe to the "group think" of the platform you're currently using (like X/Twitter today), or you could do it the Bluesky way, let people chose what blocklists to follow.
As someone who generally don't do blocklists/mutes/blocking much at all, I know what approach I prefer. I like that people have a choice at least, compared to the alternative approaches.
Re:Bluesky's Quest to Build Nontoxic Social Media
by moomin on Monday April 07, 2025 @08:03AM
(#43610321)
Actually, shared blocklists originated in the desire to avoid harassment. You can make a case for that being group think if you like, but I doubt you'll convince me.
Re:Bluesky's Quest to Build Nontoxic Social Media
by SanjayMehta on Monday April 07, 2025 @09:01AM
(#43610806)
I think your statement is the very definition of group think.
One person makes a blocklist and everyone else blindly adopts it.
Re:Bluesky's Quest to Build Nontoxic Social Media
by pseudalopex on Monday April 07, 2025 @09:38AM
(#43611306)
Many people make block lists. And asserting people adopt them blindly is begging the question.
Re:Bluesky's Quest to Build Nontoxic Social Media
by pmarreck on Monday April 07, 2025 @04:59PM
(#43615885)
If this answer is satire, it is very clever.
In practice, shared blocklists are not utilized to stop harassment, they are utilized to enforce ideological conformity and lack of critical-thinking
Re:Bluesky's Quest to Build Nontoxic Social Media
by konart on Monday April 07, 2025 @08:05AM
(#43610339)
Livejournal had (has?) this concept for 15-20 years.
Just saying.
Re:Bluesky's Quest to Build Nontoxic Social Media
by TMWNN on Monday April 07, 2025 @02:33PM
(#43614483)
>Livejournal had (has?) this concept for 15-20 years.
... and became irrelevant about 20 years ago.
Re:Bluesky's Quest to Build Nontoxic Social Media
by gspr on Monday April 07, 2025 @08:00AM
(#43610305)
Would you call it the same when a bunch of your friends recommend you stay away from someone? Or the opposite, introduce you to someone they like?
Re:Bluesky's Quest to Build Nontoxic Social Media
by themaninthedark on Monday April 07, 2025 @08:25AM
(#43610503)
Only for the most part; people online aren't my friends, there is not enough interaction/depth of interaction to get to really know them and being online tends to turn people into fuckwads(1). They just happen to be you're kind of fuckwads.
(1)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_disinhibition_effect
Re:Bluesky's Quest to Build Nontoxic Social Media
by SanjayMehta on Monday April 07, 2025 @08:58AM
(#43610761)
That’s a stretch.
It’s well accepted that people tend to be more unpleasant online, and text doesn’t translate nuance well enough to avoid misunderstandings, no matter how many emojis are assigned to the task.
Re:Bluesky's Quest to Build Nontoxic Social Media
by intended on Tuesday April 08, 2025 @02:44AM
(#43618981)
Blocklists are used by women quite extensively, to block everything from specific terms to specific harassers and specific communities and topics.
Re:Bluesky's Quest to Build Nontoxic Social Media
by pmarreck on Monday April 07, 2025 @04:58PM
(#43615868)
Being put on a shared blocklist isn't a "stay away from this person"; it's a "tell these thousand people to stay away from these other thousand people regardless of actual basis, because 1 person got offended"