But that’s correct. 9.9 = 9.90 > 9.11. Seems that it answered the question absolutely correctly.
He's using Semantic versioning/s
I suggest we’ve already now passed what shall be dubbed the jschoe test ;)
Re:Qwen2.5-VL-32B: Smarter and Lighter
by manaskarekar on Monday March 24, 2025 @10:04PM
(#43467458)
jschoe's post is actually a Turing test for us. :)
(just kidding jschoe)
Re:Qwen2.5-VL-32B: Smarter and Lighter
by declan_roberts on Monday March 24, 2025 @10:37PM
(#43467639)
He's Poe's law testing us.
Re:Qwen2.5-VL-32B: Smarter and Lighter
by sebastiennight on Tuesday March 25, 2025 @12:19AM
(#43468092)
I will now refer to this as the jschoe test in my writing and publications as well!
It's interesting to think that maybe one of the most realistic consequences of reaching artificial superintelligence will be when its answers start wildly diverging from human expectations and we think it's being "increasingly wrong".
Re:Qwen2.5-VL-32B: Smarter and Lighter
by aurareturn on Monday March 24, 2025 @10:04PM
(#43467459)
+1 to Deepseek
-1 to humanity
Re:Qwen2.5-VL-32B: Smarter and Lighter
by yencabulator on Tuesday March 25, 2025 @01:43PM
(#43473925)
Based on the presented reasoning, that means humanity wins! Yay!
Sorry, I don't quite see what is wrong here.
Re:Qwen2.5-VL-32B: Smarter and Lighter
by manaskarekar on Monday March 24, 2025 @09:11PM
(#43467145)
Parent is thinking Semantic Versioning.
Re:Qwen2.5-VL-32B: Smarter and Lighter
by declan_roberts on Monday March 24, 2025 @10:46PM
(#43467670)
One of many pet peeves with semver
Semantic version contains 3 numbers.
I’ve legit seen a heated online debate with hundreds of comments about this question (maybe not the exact numbers), and I don’t think most participants were memeing. People are that bad at math. It’s depressing.
Re:Qwen2.5-VL-32B: Smarter and Lighter
by cplusplus6382 on Monday March 24, 2025 @09:08PM
(#43467120)
Answer is correct no?
Re:Qwen2.5-VL-32B: Smarter and Lighter
by owebmaster on Monday March 24, 2025 @11:00PM
(#43467732)
> I don't think anything else needs to be said here.
Will this humbling moment change your opinion?
What do you think the answer is?
16 is obviously larger than both 9.9 and 9.11. AI will never be capable of thinking outside the box like that and find the correct answer.
9.9 is larger than 9.11. This right here is the perfect example of the dunning-kruger effect.
Maybe try rephrase your question to "which version came later, 9.9 or 9.11".
Re:Qwen2.5-VL-32B: Smarter and Lighter
by kwakubiney on Monday March 24, 2025 @09:10PM
(#43467132)
But the answer is correct? 9.9 is larger than 9.11
Re:Qwen2.5-VL-32B: Smarter and Lighter
by dangoodmanUT on Monday March 24, 2025 @09:10PM
(#43467131)
9.9-9.11 =0.79
Might want to check your math? Seems right to me
This makes my day.
Re:Qwen2.5-VL-32B: Smarter and Lighter
by erichocean on Monday March 24, 2025 @10:09PM
(#43467485)
This is hilarious, especially if it's unintentional.
Re:Qwen2.5-VL-32B: Smarter and Lighter
by declan_roberts on Monday March 24, 2025 @10:47PM
(#43467674)
Poe's law in effect.
Re:Qwen2.5-VL-32B: Smarter and Lighter
by bongodongobob on Monday March 24, 2025 @10:03PM
(#43467451)
Lol, well I guess we've a achieved the functional equivalent of AGI, at least for you. Please don't delete your comment.
Re:Qwen2.5-VL-32B: Smarter and Lighter
by WithinReason on Tuesday March 25, 2025 @03:59AM
(#43468916)
You just failed the Turing test, now we know you're an LLM.
Q: "9.11 and 9.9, which one is larger?"
A: "To determine which number is larger between 9.11 and 9.9, let's compare them step by step. Both numbers have the same whole number part: 9. 9.11 has a 1 in the tenths place. 9.9 has a 9 in the tenths place. Since 9 (from 9.9) is greater than 1 (from 9.11), we can conclude that 9.9 is larger than 9.11."
"Final Answer: 9.9"
I don't think anything else needs to be said here.