Re:Show HN: LinkedIn sucks, so I built a better one
by lm28469 on Monday March 24, 2025 @08:33AM
(#43460305)
Sure but I see absolutely no way a picture would allow you to tell if someone's a bot or not.
You can already generate a profile picture and have it lip synced with a text to speech audio (or even speech to speech). It's a losing (lost?) fight
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FK8sgB-58q0
Internet is rapidly becoming a pile of steaming shit already, captchas were annoying but now it seems the "are you a robot" test is coming everywhere, what a sad state of affairs. I wonder how much of the overall traffic is automated, 80%? 90% ?
Re:Show HN: LinkedIn sucks, so I built a better one
by bigtechennui on Monday March 24, 2025 @09:00AM
(#43460574)
Adding a field that AI can generate cheaply sounds like a way to INCREASE AI spam
Re:Show HN: LinkedIn sucks, so I built a better one
by johnnyanmac on Monday March 24, 2025 @10:45AM
(#43461704)
cheap is part of the factor here. Pictures aren't expensive to generate, but are a magnitude more expensive than generating a bunch of text. Meanwhile, pictures are trivial for humans to verify against a simple search.
Photos may not be the final solution to this flood of automation, but it's being dabbled with.