News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: A bi-directional, persisted KV store that is fas... by tobyhinloopen on Monday March 17, 2025 @11:40AM (#43389682)
Not open source, not interested.

It looks neat though, but I won't burn myself on anything closed source if there's open source and/or self-hosted alternatives.

Re:Show HN: A bi-directional, persisted KV store that is fas... by Aurornis on Monday March 17, 2025 @12:15PM (#43390053)
The comparison to Redis felt misleading when I realized it was a commercial product.

I'm not sure I like this recent trend of people registering new accounts on HN to use "Show HN" to pitch commercial products.

Show HN is fun to see projects people have been working on and want to share for the good of the community. It's less fun when it's being used as a simple advertising mechanism to drive purchases.

Re:Show HN: A bi-directional, persisted KV store that is fas... by gkbrk on Monday March 17, 2025 @12:19PM (#43390097)
It's a suitable comparison I think. Redis is also not open-source.

https://github.com/redis/redis/blob/unstable/LICENSE.txt

Re:Show HN: A bi-directional, persisted KV store that is fas... by old_bayes on Monday March 17, 2025 @12:23PM (#43390140)
As of 12 months ago, sure, but before that Redis was open source for 15 years.
Re:Show HN: A bi-directional, persisted KV store that is fas... by pvg on Monday March 17, 2025 @12:30PM (#43390221)
Show HN is not limited to open source projects.
Re:Show HN: A bi-directional, persisted KV store that is fas... by Aurornis on Monday March 17, 2025 @01:18PM (#43390679)
I never said it was. Seeing green accounts (just registered) doing nothing other than promote products doesn't feel consistent with the spirit of Show HN.
Re:Show HN: A bi-directional, persisted KV store that is fas... by pvg on Monday March 17, 2025 @03:12PM (#43391799)
There's nothing wrong with green accounts doing Show HNs, really.
Re:Show HN: A bi-directional, persisted KV store that is fas... by tschellenbach on Monday March 17, 2025 @11:54AM (#43389856)
Doesn't always help. Price hikes on CockroachDB for instance have been crazy.
Re:Show HN: A bi-directional, persisted KV store that is fas... by mehrant on Monday March 17, 2025 @11:51AM (#43389820)
thanks for taking time and commenting :) we'd still be happy if you decided to use it and give us your thoughts. as I mentioned in one of the comments below, we're hoping to go open source in future :)
Re:Show HN: A bi-directional, persisted KV store that is fas... by verdverm on Monday March 17, 2025 @12:04PM (#43389948)
> we're hoping to go open source in future :)

That's just lip service, either you intend to or you don't, it's not up to hope

We hope you will see the dev tooling space is based around open source and you will alienate many potential users by not being open source

Re:Show HN: A bi-directional, persisted KV store that is fas... by tobyhinloopen on Monday March 17, 2025 @12:11PM (#43390019)
Let me know when it's open source and I'd be happy to give it a try! It doesn't even have to be free - I'm fine with Unreal's model where you get access to the source even though commercial use requires a paid license.

I want something running locally on my machine that doesn't rely on calling home.

Re:Show HN: A bi-directional, persisted KV store that is fas... by mehrant on Monday March 17, 2025 @12:38PM (#43390323)
your concern is understandable. we'll be in touch :)
Re:Show HN: A bi-directional, persisted KV store that is fas... by hdjjhhvvhga on Monday March 17, 2025 @12:20PM (#43390106)
Give me one reason to use a closed-source Redis alternative rather than one of many open ones, starting with KeyDB. If I wanted a closed clone, I'd probably go with DragonflyDB (whose license is "feel free to run it in production unless you offer it as a managed redis service").
Re:Show HN: A bi-directional, persisted KV store that is fas... by h1fra on Monday March 17, 2025 @12:25PM (#43390171)
agree, especially on something as common as Redis. Being locked in is not worth the better perf on something already super-fast.

But then I wonder what the business model is here? Even without being open-source, I'm constantly asking myself who pays for DBs that are not in a major cloud