News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Beyond the 70%: Maximizing the human 30% of AI-assisted coding. Parent comment

Re:Beyond the 70%: Maximizing the human 30% of AI-assisted c... by 4b11b4 on Friday March 14, 2025 @10:51AM (#43363170)
Dario.. is one of the few people that we should actually be taking seriously... although I don't have anything other than my intuition to back this up. Maybe just Anthropic's direction, consistency, principles and vibe overall.

edit: While yes, the validity of such a drastic claim remains to be seen.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Beyond the 70%: Maximizing the human 30% of AI-assisted c... by apwell23 on Friday March 14, 2025 @11:01AM (#43363279)
you believe AI will double human lifespan by 2027? Is this some sort of cult that i am not a part of.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Beyond the 70%: Maximizing the human 30% of AI-assisted c... by 4b11b4 on Friday March 14, 2025 @11:46AM (#43363757)
Absolutely not, but I'm far removed from any position to make a statement either way. I'm guessing there is some path to having breakthroughs in bio/chem/physics that is regarded as a possibility. Of course, if even possible, would only be for very few individuals.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Beyond the 70%: Maximizing the human 30% of AI-assisted c... by owebmaster on Friday March 14, 2025 @05:15PM (#43367368)
Even if there is the scientific breakthrough in 10 years, bureaucracy and distribution would take another 10-20 years. Even worse, IPs might make it too expensive and take 20 years more.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Beyond the 70%: Maximizing the human 30% of AI-assisted c... by apwell23 on Saturday March 15, 2025 @07:18AM (#43371768)
well..giving out exact dates is different from 'some path to breakthroughs' .

Why do you think Dario is giving out exact dates?

[ Parent | on HN ]